whats the cost of 4 r7 2700x and you have nearly the BOM cost for TR2 so $1,500.00 give or take for BOM add a bit for profit call it $1700 for 32 core part. $1,500 for 28 core part. and on down from there every 4 cores.
When you get to these high end chips, you dont follow same margins rates as lower end products. hence why 32 core epyc can cost almost 5g
willing to bet next epyc core count will be 64 core.
Considering epyc is going straight to zen2, def will be a thing.
zen2 at 7nm will be nuts.
1 Like
Shit 9 bucks off my budget.
Cinebench a lot of times identifies 10 as 8.
My PC’s identify as 8 despite being on 10
1 Like
Did not know as I only have run unigin benchmarks to check gpu OC and just use prime or the like to stress cpu OC
I know, right? Like the video above that has the new Intel process at 5Ghz.
Meanwhile, all the sites in the GPP thread were still selling AMD GPUs. Damn that pesky reality! 
I believe I conceded when Asus branched their brand into Aruz or whatever. I even @'d nan directly. So, yeah, sorry I don’t scream the sky is falling at the first hint of something crazy lol.
I appreciate your responses (I do!), but that wasn’t my point. My point was people should chill out and not treat this as an anti-Intel sounding board 
Not only is it silly to demonstrate that but to actually hide the cooling solution which will be required to make a 28 core, 5GHZ part happen is also absurd. In some ways it worked… looked at what I quoted in the TH article, Ian Cuttress also didn’t bother to question how could this be realistic in any way, shape or form. All the press is singing Intel’s praises… for something that come close to being reality.
No idea.
Looks like that is the case here too. The recycle bin should be round on windows 8 as far as I can google it. In Paul’s video it is rectangular at 1:21.
would you be willing to pay for a machine that was on for at least 6hrs a day pulling 2,000 watts of energy from the wall . cost wise would it be some thing that you dont mind paying for as its what you enjoy so cost be damned. ( conservative guess)
@RevampedTech @anon79053375 @noenken @Argone @looming-hawk
Welcome in, let’s keep this thread to computex news though.
Calling on the @moderators to enforce that, if it doesn’t happen.
What do you think intel will say the TDP is? We should start a betting poll
125 Watt
I understand. I think intel has good products but at the same time AMD and Nvidia do too. It is just the larger companies who tend to practice anti competitive ethics. In the past intel had a program in early to mid 2000s that worked against their competition. A fine was determined by EU Antitrust Regulation. This I think has happened a number of times. Same goes for nvidia. When a company gets so big they are or practically are a monopoly, they tend to become anti competitive to keep their foot hold. If AMD was a monopoly they would more than likely do what intel has done. Nvidia attempted the same thing with the partner program. If a renowned brand such as ROG was only able to brand only Nvidia gpus, wouldn’t someone that is just beginning their computer building think that rog is the beez neez because traditional ROG represented the top of ASUS’ line? Many people see intel as evil or nvidia because they in appearance sake take anti competitive measures. AMD would likely do the same thing if the shoe were on the other foot.
Their highest 28 core is only 205w right now
well there i7 6 core is “95” watt, just as my 1700 is “65” watt not at 3.95Ghz it is. Wattage on boxes or list are hmmmm little dodgy no?