Resolution-Gate and why this is an Issue

           "Resolution Gate" has been a big topic going around in the gaming industry. You probably have seen news stories on how PS4 and XBOX One cannot run games at 1080p nor at 60fps but instead 720p or 900p. Some gamers are probably getting sick of hearing this topic and write on forums saying: "Why can't we just go back to the old days where games were not about graphics but just gameplay.” or “I play games, not pixels!" I don't 1080p because I'm not some graphics whore!” Well here is the thing: We have always been graphics whores.

             It is simply the truth. We, gamers, love visuals and has been apparent ever since the dawn of video games. Sure, gameplay is more important than graphics and I stand by that ideology but graphics was, and still is, a marketing and selling point console competitors use to get consumers to buy the console and people buy into it. When the NES came out in 1983 while everybody owned an Atari 2600, people were amazed by how advanced and cutting-edge it was. That was considered advanced back in the day and leaps and bounds more capable than the Atari 2600 (Tangent note: That was the only time consoles were actually more powerful than PCs until the Commodore 64 and Apple II). NES ruled the later half of the 80s until two other consoles came into the market: The TurboGrafx 16 and the Sega Genesis. The NES had 8-bit graphics, the Sega Genesis and TurboGrafx could play games in 16-bit and that was the main selling point and the start of the Bit Wars.

             You ever heard of the phrase “Genesis does, what Nintendon't” or “Blast Processing”? That was Sega's marketing campaign they use in their commercials and advertisements showing how the Genesis is more capable vs Nintendo's offerings. TurboGrafx did a commercial on how advanced its console was compared to the NES. Leaps and bounds better and people back then ate that up for how vastly better it was. Nintendo retaliated with the SNES in 1991 and how it has a huger color palette than its competitors and can actually play some three-dimensional games like Star Fox & Super Mario RPG. This then resulted in the two companies aggressively competing against each other for console supremacy and prepubescent American children fighting at their school playgrounds over which plastic box is better all the way until the mid 90s when the Nintendo 64 and Sony Playstation One came out and Sega going downhill.

           Now back to resolution. You can't have too many pixels, eh? You ask yourself why is 1080p such a big deal? Isn't it recent? 

            Nope, 1080p has been around for more than a decade! Early 2000s I would go far back as to say. Sure, back then it was a luxury to have just like 4K is now but it was going to be more affordable in a few years. 1080P is already a standard now and getting monitors and TV's at that native resolution are cheap and easy to get. In a few years from now, 4K will become the new standard for displays. The big thing you need to know is during the 7th generation of consoles, Sony and Microsoft promised that their consoles could play games at 1080p or full HD but fall backed on that and instead said that they would do 720p instead and upscale the resolution. Now these consoles could play games at 1080p/60fps if the games were as simple as the PS2/Original Xbox. Graphical stagnation doesn't look good for your console and the consumer doesn't want to buy a new console if the graphics looks the same as its predecessor. Developers instead have to use the raw power of new consoles to have stunning visuals even if it means the game will run at a lower frame rate and resolution. Guess what: people will buy a new console if it means they will get a better experience from the older console and has more eye candy. Eye candy is one of those things where you say to yourself “I got to have it. No! I need it!”. You don't want to keep that old Xbox and be called the poor kid among your peers. Its like having a VCR while everybody including your grandma has a DVD player.

             Move on to the current generation of consoles, the PS4 and the Xbox Juan (yes, I intentionally misspelled it. No, I am not going to change it.). After the 8 year long 7th generation of consoles, people were expecting that these new consoles would do 1080p/60fps flawlessly, but they are playing at the same resolutions just as the last generation. Here is a quick rundown of the past console generation and the resolutions they were able to run at the time: 6th gen(480p), 7th gen(720p), 8th gen(720-900p?). 900p is still below Full HD, and the 60fps is just out of the question. To give an example, look at the 8th gen console version of games like Destiny, TitanFall and Watch Dogs and compare it to the 7th gen console ports. They look almost identical. You may say “But the PS4 and Xbox One versions looks slightly better than its predecessors, Ike!” That is the thing: “slightly” better, not a night and day difference better like other console generations before it. Because of this, people are questioning about the capabilities of the new consoles and start to ask themselves “Did I just just pay $400 for a console that plays at the exact same resolution as the one before it?” and “Why did I bother upgrading to a new console if I am basically getting the same thing?”. We live in an era where everything is in 1080p whether in TV shows, movies, YouTube videos, and yet console games can't do the same thing? This is why 1080p is a big freaking deal. Imagine when 4K resolution becomes the norm in a few years and console games still run at 720p. People will be outraged and disappointed, simple as that.

             Now what should be done to deal with this debacle? Personally, I would like to see developers give you graphical options like in PC gaming so you have the choice to turn down the visuals (like shadow quality, view distance, anisotropic filtering, texture quality, etc) if you want to have smoother gameplay and higher resolutions or turn up the graphics if you want that eye-candy but willing to sacrificing performance, but consoles don't give you much choices. It is 2014 and we should not tell developers to compromise framerate and resolution. I do not give two damns if you are BORED of hearing this. If you want to play better games with amazing experiences in the future, do yourself a favor and be vocal or use your wallets wisely or else developers will keeping raping you in the ass(in other words, taking advantage of you)! I hope you enjoyed the long read and learn something today and I will link down sources that support my argument. I feel this is very important topic in the game industry and should not be dismissed.

-John Bain aka TotalBiscuit's take on games running at 720p/30fps

-Article that actually predicated consoles not running at 1080p/60fps

-2006 article that tells Sony will not reach its goal of Full HD

-Rich of ReviewTechUSA's take on Resolution-Gate

-30fps vs 60fps comparison using mp4 video

-Emergence of HDTVs

-Xbox 360 will “supposedly” get 1080p

-Destiny current gen vs. last gen graphics comparison

-Watch Dogs current gen vs last gen graphics comparison

-Titanfall Xbox One vs Xbox 360 graphics comparison

"Now what should be done to deal with this debacle?"

I dont know if anything can be done about this. current gen hardware is shit. People can't have their cake and eat it too on this one. so having 1080p & 60fps is out of the question. Hell if most games struggle to hit 30fps at 792p(or what ever made up res devs want to use these days) I dont think running a game even at 720p is going to net an extra 30 fps.

"Personally, I would like to see developers give you graphical options like in PC gaming so you have the choice to turn down the visuals (like shadow quality, view distance, anisotropic filtering, texture quality, etc) if you want to have smoother gameplay and higher resolutions or turn up the graphics if you want that eye-candy but willing to sacrificing performance" 

IDK. I'm of the opinion if you want graphics options just build a PC. I could see maybe having 2 presets "30 fps" and "60fps". this way the devs can optimize both a lot better. but with that said current gen hardware sucks really really bad and you would probably be shocked at how far you would have to turn stuff down to get 1080p/60fps hence the reason why no dev is even pushing for 1080p/60 anymore. They just have to compromise way to much.

"but consoles don't give you much choices"
This is just how consoles have always been. if you want choice in how you experience games get a PC.

"It is 2014 and we should not tell developers to compromise framerate and resolution."
Again this not up for debate, if you want games to look good you cant have cutting edge graphics and have it run well at a standard res on this hardware.

"If you want to play better games with amazing experiences in the future, do yourself a favor and be vocal or use your wallets wisely or else developers will keeping raping you in the ass(in other words, taking advantage of you)!"

I cant say id equate buying (as a consenting adult none the less) shitty cheap hardware to sexual assault. I really dont think the general console player even gives this subject 2 thoughts nor do they care. like you said in your first paragraph. people like graphics to be amazing. Devs understand this and have to deliver on this expectation, so in other words their hands are tied now that they painted them selfs into this corner by pushing graphics over all else this long. if this means 30fps/792p then the devs will do that.

with all this said its still early in the console life cycle and games will continually look better but you might as well kiss that 1080p/60 dream good buy this gen because it is just not going to happen. I can even bet money that if the devs where honest about last gen I can bet most games ran closer to 480p then unscaled to 720p.

this whole thing is like someone buying a ford pinto and is getting pissed off because its not preforming like a Ferrari. you buy $400 gaming hardware its going to perform like $400 gaming hardware.

But like you said if you are upset about it vote with your wallet. but if you are hell bent on 1080p/60fps you might as well just get a PC because that is the only way you will get it. In the end this whole subject just pisses me off because those same devs are trying to pull this shit on PC (evil within) and locking games 30fps and crap (not even properly rendered correctly) aspect ratios because this gen of consoles is so damn shitty.

Eh 1080p 60fps is attainable even on the xb1, the 460 gtx(similar in power) could run some games at 1080/60. Sure they may not be as "pretty" as some things they've shown but they'd still be better than last gen.  Mostly I think its the incompetent dev teams just going after the "WOW!" factor for the e3 trailer and hoping that'll sell the game, as opposed to actually making a good running game.  Yeah this gen hardware sucks ass, but it still could be used better.   Heck event thew last gen had some 1080p and the wiiu has a decent number of 1080/60 games.

These "Gate" Hash-tags need to Stop already. Microsoft and Sony had ALL the Chance in the Bloody world to actually make a difference in the console market but chose not to. It's Embarrassing Already and the reason is it's embarrassing is because we and I mean (Everyone not just us PC Gamers) have had some Monitor or Television that is 1080p for YEARS and the Consoles STILL can't even provide a decent 1080p Experience. AMD & Nvidia are trying to focus on Efficiency. Considering since Both Microsoft and Sony Went to AMD to Get their Hardware which isn't bad thing. Sony or Microsoft could said to AMD Hey We really want to Go off this generation can you give us a Motherboard with the R7-260x as well?

ALL Their Problems could of gone away. they could of gotten AT LEAST a 1080p 60FPS Medium Settings Gaming experience for a few years and personally considering the PS4 being as powerful as it is for a $400 System I really could of seen Sony truly KILL the Xbone with the PS4 if it had an R7-260x. it would of brought the PS4 to the price of the Xbone and Annihilated it in every way shape and form..

 

LOL had to do it but yeah the last "something"gate thing i heard was Hairgate and it was on Infowars and no I don't watch/read it.

Most of this issue is devs have painted them selfs into a corner chasing this whole "WOW! factor"/"graphics graphics graphics!!!" thing. if games struggle to even hit 30fps @ 792p I find it hard to see games hitting 1080p/60 and I dont ever see the devs that develop for MS/Sony going down the Nintendo route and making their games not be brown/gray while also trying to be photo realistic. Nintendo games can run a lot smoother and at higher res because they dont push the bounds of graphics.

 So, I agree that I would much rather have a smooth running fun game that looks like say Mario kart or smash bros than 1 that looks super amazing (graphically) but has zero substance (Crysis 2&3, Ryse)

I find this whole subject a little silly because I bet if none of the devs even talked about this than no one would even give a shit about it or even notice (the general console player that is).

I really think anyone hardcore enough to even care about this whole 1080p/60 thing is already hardcore enough to just game on PC. I mean I have been gaming at 1200p/60+fps on PC since 2005 and 1440p/60+ since 2012. so IMO this whole 1080p/60fps thing is just so 2005 to me. These consoles nor their the devs who make games for them are magic or made of magic.

-Hey, I do not support consoles anymore for they regress the gaming industry. I am switching to PC soon anyway. I just got tired of some gamers saying that "graphics are not important" when in fact they are, so I made a similar post like this before weeks ago somewhere else on the internet educating people about this issue and it got positive feedback. I'm aware this is more of a PC forum and most people know about this, but if there was somebody that didn't know, well they learned something today. Thank you for reading my post regardless.

"I don't know if anything can be done about this. current gen hardware is shit. People can't have their cake and eat it too on this one. so having 1080p & 60fps is out of the question. Hell if most games struggle to hit 30fps at 792p(or what ever made up res devs want to use these days) I dont think running a game even at 720p is going to net an extra 30 fps."

-Well I was trying to sound hopeful to the people reading this from before, but I understand the entire reality and it is not good.

"IDK. I'm of the opinion if you want graphics options just build a PC. I could see maybe having 2 presets "30 fps" and "60fps". this way the devs can optimize both a lot better. but with that said current gen hardware sucks really really bad and you would probably be shocked at how far you would have to turn stuff down to get 1080p/60fps hence the reason why no dev is even pushing for 1080p/60 anymore. They just have to compromise way to much."

-Well, that is and 500 other reasons why I am making the switch to PC soon. I really hate the fact that developers had to cut down/simplify a game just for it to run on a console. Infamous Second Son pretty much used all of the hardware capabilities of the PS4 and the devs found out the CPU was a huge bottleneck. Many of the games on the current-gen console do not interest me anymore. I want to try out games like Star Citizen, Half-Life, Deus Ex, where there is actually ingenuity to them.

"I cant say id equate buying (as a consenting adult none the less) shitty cheap hardware to sexual assault. I really dont think the general console player even gives this subject 2 thoughts nor do they care. like you said in your first paragraph. people like graphics to be amazing. Devs understand this and have to deliver on this expectation, so in other words their hands are tied now that they painted them selfs into this corner by pushing graphics over all else this long. if this means 30fps/792p then the devs will do that."

-When I mean devs raping you, I mean more of as giving bullshit reasons why their game is at 720p/30fps like cinematic, detracts the experience or you can't tell the difference anyway. it is really Sony/MS fault for making these shitty potato boxes in the first place.
 
"with all this said its still early in the console life cycle and games will continually look better but you might as well kiss that 1080p/60 dream good buy this gen because it is just not going to happen. I can even bet money that if the devs where honest about last gen I can bet most games ran closer to 480p then unscaled to 720p."

-Since the consoles have x86 architecture, yeah they actually will look worse as time goes by since devs know how it works and used it up to its fullest potential. Sure games like FF15, The Order 1886, and Metal Gear Solid V look stunning, but I'm afraid that is the best we will ever see of the consoles.

"this whole thing is like someone buying a ford pinto and is getting pissed off because its not preforming like a Ferrari. you buy $400 gaming hardware its going to perform like $400 gaming hardware."

-Well the thing is we were promised 1080p in the beginning of the 7th gen consoles and that wasn't delivered. So with the 8th gen, people expected 1080p/60fps would be no cake for them but that is not the case. A $400 PC with a GTX 750 TI and Pentium G3258 can destroy these new consoles and achieve 1080p/60fps at least on medium settings.

"But like you said if you are upset about it vote with your wallet. but if you are hell bent on 1080p/60fps you might as well just get a PC because that is the only way you will get it. In the end this whole subject just pisses me off because those same devs are trying to pull this shit on PC (evil within) and locking games 30fps and crap (not even properly rendered correctly) aspect ratios because this gen of consoles is so damn shitty."

-I want this console generation for people to realize that PC gaming is the better alternative. I am just educating the population, that is all. I know consoles can't deal 1080p so PC it is for me. I hate how the consoles really hold back PC gaming. I wish devs make the game on PC first and then port it to consoles but Sony/MS are greedy.

As a person who has been gaming on console for 13 years(I'm 18), it sucks to be in a community where most of the people are freaking casuals who like their games being played for them and will buy anything that has a slightly better coat of paint. If I say something like to them like "Have you ever played or heard of [insert game that is not COD] before?" they will be like "WTF kind of gay shit is that? Does it involve explosions?" They are very easy for devs to take advantage of.

Well, not everybody know about the wonderful magical place called PC gaming.

Sorry for the title. Could not think of anything better.

if they could have waited one more year, then they would be able to deliver 1080p/60fps. This gen of consoles are just nothing but disappointment. Seriously a new $400 custom PC with a Pentium G3258 and GTX 750 TI is way better than a console. At least I got a PS4 as a Christmas gift. Glad I did not buy it. Hell if there is still disappointment after 2015, I will just have to sell it otherwise it will be a dust magnet.

Surfing through the interwebs, I found a archive forum post from IGN of all place of a guy that actually PREDICTED that the consoles would be a huge disappointment and will not deliver 1080p/60fps...and nobody listened to him. 

WARNING: PEASANTRY LEVELS EXTREMELY HIGH: http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/ps4-1-8-teraflops-thats-ok-but-still-disappointing.453027039/

They didn't even have to wait at all. The R9 and R7 series dropped in October of Last year if my memory serves me right. They could of put an R7-260X in the console. shit even a AMD's 7850K can game at 1080P if you turn it down to medium. The PS4 and Xbone launched in November, i kinda remember cause COD Ghosts was a launch title and those games always get released in November. They could of avoided this but chose not to. And i guess we are seeing the aftermath. Microsoft and sony are planning to make slim versions of the consoles with updated hardware.

" Now what should be done to deal with this debacle?" Honestly i don't think there is any thing that can be done. These consoles are here and we have to deal with them for the next five years or so. 

i dunno... seems like the only people complaining about consoles graphics are pc gamers...

I was the same when I was your age. I didn't really get into PC gaming until I was about 14/15. sure I gamed on PC before that but I never had that great of a PC so I mainly played on consoles. I still own consoles (with the exception of any of the current gen ones) Iv been playing metroid prime 3 on my wii(I bought the wii at launch) this last week and I played my 360(I also bought at launch) a few months ago when a friend forced me to play Red dead (I though it was boring, shallow and slow). I bought the N64 and Gamecube at launch as well and the first xbox a year after it came out. With all that said I dont think PC is immune to the whole CoD erra of dumb games for simple minded people. but with PC you just have so many more options and nitch hardcore games can do really well here so more are made for PC.

In a way it makes me sad that I have 0 excitement for these consoles because I grew up playing on consoles, bought many on launch, but the current target audience for them is so far away from what I am that I get that I'm not the target audience for consoles anymore. but on the other hand I had not even powered on my 360 or wii for the last 6 years of their life. So in a way consoles started to die long before these new ones were even out. But when I think about it, this was around the time the first steam sales had started. Just the thought of paying $60 for a single game again is enough for me to write these things off. It kind of comes to to why invest money in a device that the content you buy for it dies with that console. I like the fact when I buy a game on PC its a game I can play on any new system I build in the future and I like that the games I bought 20 years ago for PC can still be played on any of the systems iv built since than. 

My only fear out of this whole thing is all the stupid ass kids that grew up using and playing on the festering cesspool known as XBL all coming to PC and thinking they can get away with acting like they did on XBL. 

New telltale game about Watergate, get to play as Nixon: only runs at 30 fps at 720p.

Watergate-gate

My thing is, if you aren't happy with console performance, don't buy one. It's not like you bought one without knowing what its capabilities are. Console gamers are in no position to bitch about it.

Wow you guys did a good job this took me 5 mins to read 

pros of console

-does not crash 

-less cheating (cod does not count)

-univeral

-easy comication and match making

-games made for long times (xbox 360 suport is till 2016 for all games)

cons of console

-limted preformace

-death treaths (xbox live)

 

PC MASTER RACE

Pros

-cheaper

-use for alot more then gaming (xbox one could argure that)

-faster

-upgradeable

-cheap games

Cons

-cheaters

-crashes

-gliches galore

-tailend of AAA titles (but looks better on pc

 

I have an xbox one and a R9 290x in my rig. If i want to lie down in the bed I play on my xbox one. The pc is you have to wait for the dlc (steam origin uhh .... uplay) then you would have for the game to boot up. BF4 on pc vs xbox is like 1:34 vs 3:49. so in bed xbox hard coregaming PCMASTERRACE

Good thing is one I got a PS4 for Christmas and two: I was already done with console gaming when I found out about PC gaming a couple years ago. I wasn't going to buy a console unless it was a gift. Even though console are inferior, I expected that they could do at least 1080p/60fps flawlessly since they promised before on 7th gen consoles that they could do it but didn't deliver. However, now it is not the case and history is repeating itself.

Sorry for the title. Didn't had anything better to put on at the time.

Well, they are extremely doomed especially with advancements like Virtual Reality and 4K coming soon. Meanwhile, I will switch over to PC once I get the funds.

From what I can remember, I had the N64, PS1, PS2, Gamecube, PS3. PS2/Gamecube were my favorites due to the variety of games of different genres that are made and there was no "mainstream" game that everybody is trying to copy off. Now it is just the same type of game on a few genres: sports, first person shooters (Which are freaking awful to play on a console), action/adventure, third person shooter. Like where are the RPGs, Puzzles, horror, and other genres (I know some genres like strategy can never work on a console). Everyday now, I see less of a reason to own a console. When Metal Gear Solid V & GTAV was announced for PC, I have no interest to buy it on a console. I'm pretty sure Final Fantasy 15 and Kingdom Hearts 3 will be on PC as well. 

When I learn about PC gaming and saw all of the kinds of games that I could play, I feel like I am really not a gamer (in my eyes) until I try games like Half-Life, Deus Ex, Thief (original trilogy), Stalker, etc. Plus there are emulators which give me a chance to play all of the old games I never played before like Chrono Trigger or Metroid Prime (Yeah, I missed that one out). 

Obviously I am not stating that everybody on PC are nice and wonderful people. It depends on what game you are playing. If it is COD or League of Legends, then I will still meet a bunch of asshats but a high competitive match on Counter-Strike; probably better.

The point is: I want to get the hell away from this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9Fctn2Pgik but I know eventually we may see them soon in a few years.