I’ll never try outwit physics. . not on purpose at least. Even though I’ve never been a science student… but I respect it too much…
Let’s get to it then. Even though I am 99% sure there’s some fundamental limitation which I’m missing here… But 1% was enough to propelled my interest to do a lot of thinking last year then I stopped… until now… So I’ll do some remembering of all the hypothesis and examples I was thinking then…
Here’s some premise… Assuming information is never lost, it’s obviously embedded in the structures. Universe is a structure. We track back and predict past states of the universe with some accuracy to make hypothesis/theories…
Universe is probably probabilistic… Everything exist in probabilities… We’re experiencing reality that are highest probabilities in single layer/slice separated by unit of time. But information linking/chaining has been going from beginning to end… From higher dimension universe is like one single geometric structure that consist of all past, present and future… Now take that last layer of the structure… the final product… it’s not a stretch to think it might be possible to track back step by step however not by us for sure…
We’ve some units of intelligence to make memories and predict probabilities but not smart enough access all the spectrum at once… We help ourselves with tools like computers…
What if it’s not necessary to store informations in space. what if all the informations exist in probabilities and we’ve not yet figured out a definitive ways to access it…
We do it to some degree with humans intelligence. however we’ve to consider that we have a primordial form of intelligence… But think of intelligence like a force… smart phone, smart speaker… smart force?? sorry…
Even though it doesn’t really fit the definition of force. but it’s my hypothesis that Intelligence at maximum functional potential in a confined space-time, will probably behave repetitive and even constant like other forces but it might be very wrong… At fundamental level, unit of intelligence is predicting change in state… you can also say that higher intelligence can predict complex systems with very high accuracy…
We need forgo classical physics… and focus on quantum here…
State of real is high probability for us… you can say we experience high probabilities that are crystallized into physical nature…
So for 1 second let’s say nothing is crystal here… it’s all cloud of probabilities we’re surfing through… At local scale we influence probabilities individually and collectively…
So if there was an intelligence force so strong which can influence and distort probability vector so much that reality becomes merely options and choices…
I think at this point P=NP… and if so, everything that would occur, has already occurred, there is no waiting linearly for passing of time. There would be no concept of free will, no fundamental difference between computing or picking out results; kinda like 4th dimensional being. ok… it’s going too far…
So getting back to information encoding mechanism. I am assuming that if you’re going to encode some information in time-chains… It already exist in probabilities… But you need to computing it to get it…
The different is… We are using our own information encoding algorithms and exactly know how it works… we also know initial state and we know the final structure of the object and last timestamp…
Key here is evolving structure… it has to be in “motion” with time… the structure is always evolving whether you add new information or not. if you don’t add information then evolution structure is easily predictable. Kinda like numbers… if 1 second = 1 and 100 seconds to 100 then what’s at 66 seconds? But complication add up when we add information to structure at certain timestamp, it changes the structure to accommodate that piece of information and continue slightly newer evolution…
so at every time stamp you can store 0 or 1… we can add a predefined locking mechanism and lock-key pares while encoding, which can be used validate at every iteration if prediction is correct… validation itself is probabilistic… a slight bias towards correct answer opens the lock… it’s vague but I’m not sure how else to explain this…
Remember we’re not storing the lock or key in data necessarily… it’s all embedded in the encoding algorithm and structure accounts for that… decoding algorithm is suppose to predicts 0 or 1 and validates the structure as key in predefined lock-key pares by encoding algorithm… One thing I’m sure is that if it works then it has employ some kind of prediction model…
I’ll probably add some drawings… I really want to get through this…