Yesterday i returned my main SSD, an Inland Premium 1TB to my motherboard after running a SATA drive for a few days for testing.
Anyway, i decided to benchmark the drive since i haven’t done it in a year or more, i downloaded CrystalDiskMark 8 and went to town.
Read speeds are correct, but write speeds concerned me a bit, it was way lower than last year, i tried changing modes in Crystal to make sure, but it either gave me the same or worse results.
I downloaded AS SSD, which i had never used before and tested again, now that one gave me a much more similar result in comparison with last year’s test, so, what’s the deal with the result discrepancy?
I also noticed, comparing CrystalDiskMark 8 and CristalDiskMark 6 screenshoots, is that the benchmarks have different names, therefore different functions, so maybe the result is correct and i’m just being paranoid?
Here are the benchmarks:
Also disk benchmarks are usually more finicky than gpu/cpu stuff. Depends on many variables. And with SSD’s situation got even more complicated with complicated controlers, dram, variable cell levels etc. You basically benchmarking another computer.
@Automobili3XF Are you aware of the need to “erase” flash memory after use before writing to it again, and the fact that erasure is much slower than either reading or writing? Perhaps last year your SSD had a lot of never-written blocks, but this year the blocks have all been used, so they must be erased before being written?
There is a process called TRIM by which free-but-previously-used blocks are erased so they can be written quickly when the need arises. Do you know whether this is in use for your drive? It takes some setup in Linux; I don’t know about Windows.
Yes, I’m aware, on Windows 10 it’s set up to be done every week.
I was wondering if that could be the case, i checked it multiple times and even tried to manually TRIM the drive with powershell commands, but there was no improvement after manual or automatic TRIM.