Was going to wait for Zen, but i simply can't wait any longer. If i waited another year, i'd go fucking postal, then hang myself in a bathroom stall with a necktie.
Skylake build for me. Taking the case and power supply with me into the future. Just gotta remember to get the 750W version. Should be more than adequate for any single-GPU setup for my next build in 6 or so years.
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/szNtGX Only things I might consider are changing out the Xeon for a 5775c for shits and giggles, but only if my little brother decides he wants to shill out for a new build and would want my 1231-v3. Other then that I might want to chuck in a bigger ssd but I'm not to pressed to do so. Maybe a 500gb for games. Meh.
They are unlocked as far as i know. I already have an z97board with a 3258 so ? I think they say that it may not be best overclocker. Can't have it completely smacking skylake around.
Got this coming down the pipeline, still in concept stage but the rig itself is going to be based around the Node 202 and the R9 Nano. Budget was $1200.
Buyer wants top of the line gaming horsepower in a very small form factor. I saw an opportunity to give the Node 202 a shot, and his demands scream Nano to me. They want AAA titles 1080p@60fps minimum, with room for resolution upgrades in the future.
TDP is showing as 306W, that version of the 202 ships with a 450W Bronze rated... Anybody think this will be a problem? There will be no overclocking seeing as the chip isn't even K skew, and the gpu is clocked just fine for his needs.
I'm working on my LAN SYNDICATE build. Need to get a top panel ordered, so working on that bit, otherwise its
Fractal core 500 - custom paint/decals/cutouts tek syndicate theme i3 4170 Sapphire 290 /w custom tek syndicate backplate Some psu Some 240gb ssd White ram
450 W should be fine, unless you intend to heavily overclock the gpu.
The Nano is an incredible card, but only a slam-dunk when size restrictions demand it. The 202 actually fits long cards, so I'd at least consider a 980 as well. The Nano edges it out in performance at stock, but with a good 980, you'll potentially get quieter cooling, better overclocks, and HDMI 2.0, the lack of which on the Nano stings pretty badly. The two cards are close, so for me, it would come down to whether the buyer were leaning more toward FreeSync or G-Sync. Lots of action on the FreeSync front lately, so that's a point in the Nano's favor.