I usually over estimate a bit, probably on that order.
Also, I try to plan around what I might add later, which is usually a fair bit; most pcie slots/lanes, ram channels etc.
If you over estimate for safety, perhaps look at the 80 plus “bronze” Platinum or Gold.
Not a lot of difference, jut means it’s less wasteful when at lower usage.
Like, if you made a low power system that ramps up occasionally, like a HTPC that occasionally games or something.
But I presume you already thought of these anyway.
IIRC they calculate using the max estimated load or the rated TDP of a product. Which in theory should be pretty close to what you’d pull from the wall at 100% load on everything.
No, assuming you’re not doing LN2 overclocking or something. IMO a 650W power supply will cover like 90% of single CPU/GPU systems and a 750W like 98%. The last 2% being FX 9590 and R9 295X systems
Depends on the model. One of the 80+ Gold or higher units, more than likely yes.
I had a feeling it might be all inclusive estimate, but googling produced a lot of talk of “safety estimates” being 1.5x a product’s TDP, and also the “efficiency” jargon of 50% of a psu’s load being ideal, which would mean spending over 200 gbp on a 1000W IF I could find one right now.
The peak efficiency is way overblown. We’re talking a 3% difference in efficiency between 20/100% load and 50% load for an 80+ Gold power supply. For servers or render farms I can totally understand the reasoning, but for anybody else I don’t believe the cost is worth it.
And I just take the guesstimated system consumption and add 100W to 200W to it and grab a power supply in that range. That way it should have enough for new hard drives or fans or even overclocking.