Ok i know by definition using your cross-hairs is still a no scope, but is it really?
I got into a huge argument with a friend over this. He professed that a no scope is still valid if you use your cross-hairs. He said that people who play halo say no scoped all the time. Like as if that really shows skill.
But I say in games like Cod4 [hardcore mode] or gears of war, a no scope is a shot without a cross-hair and is more skillful then one with a cross-hair. Otherwise it's just like every other kill with a gun that has a cross-hair.
Idk when do you consider "no scoped nigga" to be appropriate, with or without cross-hair?
I totally agree... with a crosshair it's as if it's any difference from shooting a normal gun amiright? Without crosshair shows waaay more skill then with a crosshair.
No scope is sniper only. like boooooom headshot noscope scout css... because sniper is a weapon where you HAVE to use the scope.. any other weapon shoots pretty good without "aim", and normal not-snipers got HUD crosshair
tecnicaly a cross hair is to help you aim, so i dont think thats a skillful noscope, although i can no scope just fine without, although, imo no scoping is stupid cause in 1/2 the games bullets come out of the gun diagonal if you dont scope...