Hi everyone,
Looking to build a home server that will function as a NAS. Wondering if it also makes sense to have it hosting common applications that I use, like stable diffusion, git, jellyfin, or should these only be on each client PC? There are around 8 client PC’s in my home that would like to use these services, ranging from chromebooks to workstation desktops.
I’ve come up with a list of pro’s and con’s of each approach and just wanted some second opinions or thoughts on whether it makes sense or if I’m missing something.
Have GPU in the NAS and run stable diffusion on the NAS
Pro’s:
- Don’t need a GPU in each client (expensive!)
- Able to set up batches to run overnight for very large workloads
- Only have to set up stable diffusion once
- Able to upgrade clients as time goes on without hassle.
Con’s:
- May not be as secure as separating out the services into their own server
Having each client running these applications with their own GPU
Pro’s:
- NAS stays just a NAS.
Con’s:
- Expensive to buy 8+ clients with similar GPU’s at the moment.
- Would probably also be not as secure as separating out the services onto their own server.
I’m intermediate in computer security knowledge; one of my fears would be that the NAS could get malware from having stable diffusion (or more likely, a rogue plugin/dependency installed.) Having worked in IT for many years, I’ve seen some of those cryptolockers spread themselves across network shares pretty fast, so I think I’d be vulnerable either way unless I segregate the services to their own server or virtual instance.
Any input or thoughts would be appreciated.