Mich
January 10, 2013, 1:20pm
#1
Although using intel hd 4000 graphics it runs fine however i know it could run WAY better i looked the the catylst control center and couldn't find anything,
SPECS:
i7 3770k
Asus p8z77 LE Plus
16gb ripjaws x series
saphire 7970
vertex 4 128gb
WD 1tb Black
And no its not made to just run minecraft :P
TheUser
January 10, 2013, 1:33pm
#2
Minecraft primarily relies on CPU and memory. In fact, Minecraft doesn't appear to be taxing at the GPU at all because the activity monitor on my end shows 5-9% with every little graphical tweak (using Optifine) maxed out.
F8AL
January 10, 2013, 2:00pm
#3
Reinstall minecraft.
My system is way worser the yours and it runs minecraft easy :P
TheUser
January 10, 2013, 2:05pm
#4
He's not actually struggling for performance, bro.
Mich
January 10, 2013, 3:39pm
#5
I know it uses The GPU, my old computer could get 120 fps with the GPU enabled with otu it would get ~30
but the way i got it to use thr GPU was in the nvidia control [anel and i dont have the same options running an AMD card
Mich
January 10, 2013, 3:39pm
#6
Yea, I get 70 fps with intel HD 4000 But i know it could do better
TheUser
January 10, 2013, 10:29pm
#7
I get about 70-80FPS with my 2500k. Minecraft is a very demanding game despite the 16x16 textures.
Mich
January 11, 2013, 9:57pm
#8
I can get ~120 fps with a laptop but while its using it 630m.... Soooooooooooooooooo
TheUser
January 12, 2013, 2:40am
#9
Ah yes, I found that kinda strange. It turns out that I was running on 70-100 with the "Balanced" setting. "Max FPS" gave me 240-250 FPS instead.
Also: OP may want to take note.