So there are two monitors I'm currently looking at, the LG 24UD58-B and the Samsung U24E590D. The specs look very similar to each other, and I'm not really sure which one is "better", if one even is.
LG 24UD58-B specs
- Size - 23.8"
- Resolution - 3840x2160 (4K)
- Panel - IPS
- Refresh Rate - 60 Hz
- Freesync
- Response time - 5 ms GTG
- Color Gamut - 72% NTSC
- Color Depth - 8 bit + FRC
- Brightness - 250 cd/m2
- Connectors - 2x HDMI, 1x DP
- Warranty - 1 year
- Price - $280
Samsung U24E590D specs
- Size - 23.6"
- Resolution - 3840x2160 (4K)
- Panel - PLS
- Refresh Rate - 60 Hz
- Freesync
- Response time - 4 ms GTG
- Color Gamut - 100% sRGB
- Color Depth - 8 bit
- Brightness - 250 cd/m2
- Connectors - 2x HDMI, 1x DP
- Warranty - 1 year
- Price - $270
What I'm looking for is pretty simple:
- 5 ms or faster response time
- No larger than 25 inches
- Good color reproduction
- VESA mount
- Less than $300
From what I can tell both monitors satisfy those desires. The Samsung has a 1 ms faster response time and it's $10 cheaper. The LG should have better color because of the FRC and the VESA mount is in a better position. The Freesync, color gamut, refresh rate, brightness, resolution, size, warranty, and connectivity are pretty much the same as far as I can tell.
Is either one really better than the other? Alternatively, are there any monitors that I'm not looking at that I should?