I saw the Matthew Moore crap some time ago. I find it great that he tries to prove that Linux can have a virus infection by funding an infected .dll on his linux system that is impervious to such infection, as explained before.
The problem right now is superficiality. Matthew Moore, like many others, realizes that there is only one way to go, and that's open source. This is not a software fact, this is a general fact. Open Source is the new scientific method that the world needs, open source is the new political ethos the world needs, open source is the new business ethics standard the world needs, open source is just an intellectual evolution of mankind. He is struggling constantly with himself over that fact, and the thing he struggles with most, is the fact that he only scratches the surface.
Many linux aficionados, especially younger guys or guys that have only been using open source software or a couple of years or so, have no deep understanding of the logic of open source, and are still tied to the limited logic of consoleware. That leads not only to cray-cray videos like Matthew Moore's, but also to superficiality when it comes to discussing open source. This is notably a big problem on the TS forum right now in my opinion. There are a few threads concerning linux that are very popular in terms of number of hits, but they contain no practical or useful information, they are nothing but a superficial discussion that serves nobody, they are a testament of superficiality.
Now think about this y'all: superficiality and open source are diametrically opposed. The whole power of open source is the unlimited scaling of resources for the participants. Think about that also: people that use open source software, are not "users", but rather "participants". The truth is that concepts like that, are not superficial, nor can they be described or talked about in a superficial manner. Open source needs to be enjoyed to get get the whole experience. People that are not willing to go beneath the surface, cannot enjoy it, and should remain software console users, they should not discuss open source or linux, because they have nothing to add but superficiality and confusion. Those that do not see the wider scope of open source, should not concern themselves with it. That includes Matthew Moore, until he learns a thing or two about what he wants to talk about.
Then there is the fact that console-vendors are actively trolling media channels that advertise open source. This can clearly be seen on the TS forum. Since linux became a thing, massive trolling and bullying became a problem. People that participate in open source, have to be able to ignore that, have to be able to not give in to these idiots. A lot of these idiots will disguise themselves as "linux-afficionados" or "new linux users looking for info", just to try to discredit the main supporters of open source and to discredit the popular open source topics. In some markets, truth is just a commercial commodity, that's one of the reasons why more open source is needed... and open source will eventually kill this kind of commercial prostitution, and the console-vendors know it, and they fear it, that's why they even bother...