Guess somebody in Gigabyte marketing felt calling them 4R DDR5-7200 CUDIMMs sounded too much like Adata+MSI’s 4R DDR5-5600 CUDIMMs. ¯\_(ツ)_/
2 Likes
lol
I can kind of understand giving it a separate name considering it requires explicit support in BIOS to work… but then again if there isn’t consistency among the different manufactures of the same product the naming isn’t helping.