This UPS is not compatible with the selected PDU (at least, NOT in your as-tested configuration).
Let’s break down why this is true.
CyberPower PDU44001 Description
Under Product Features, the following is provided:
- Automatic Transfer Switch
Dual power cords (A and B) provide redundant power sources to devices with single power supplies and can be plugged into separate compatible sources* to ensure continuous access. Users select the preferred source as the primary input. CyberPower Smart App Online and Sinewave series UPS are highly recommended for use as the power source. *Note: Only sine wave AC power sources are compatible with this ATS PDU. Simulated sine wave AC power sources are NOT compatible.
Here we can see that ONLY pure sine wave AC power sources are compatible with this ATS PDU.
Eaton 9PX(1500RT) Product Datasheet
Reference Specifications table (page 2), Output:
Crest Factor: 3:1
Output AC Waveform (Battery Mode): Pure Sine wave
At first glance, one might be inclined to believe this UPS is a pure sine wave UPS… and they would be wrong. The UPS provides a pure sine wave output ONLY in Battery Mode (when the output load is supported by the battery).
You will note that nowhere in the product literature does Eaton go so far as to label this UPS as a “pure sine wave” UPS, even though they do specify that the output AC waveform is a “Pure Sine wave” in Battery Mode.
The (dirty) trick is hidden in an understanding of the meaning of Crest Factor.
Crest Factor (CF) is a mathematical relationship used to analyze waveforms.
CF = [Peak Value of Waveform] / [RMS Average Value of Waveform]
In AC power systems, voltage is produced as a variable output, a sine wave, where the magnitude of the voltage is changing in time.
RMS, or Root Mean Square, is used to describe the average value of a time-varying signal. For pure sine waves, the RMS value is [Peak Value / square root (2)] and so if we plug this expression into the above expression we find:
CF = [Peak Value of Waveform] / [Peak Value / square root(2)]
The peak values cancel out and we are left with CF = square root(2) or approximately 1.414.
This means that if the sine wave is a perfect sinusoid (here “perfect” means pure), then the CF, regardless of peak value, should be 1.414, and cannot go above 1.414.
But the Crest Factor for this UPS is 3:1, not 1.414:1. Ergo, when NOT operating in Battery Mode, the output is NOT a pure sine wave, even though the input from the wall IS a pure sine wave.
This is a low-end UPS and has most likely resulted in the failure of your Threadripper system PSU due to incompatibility with the paired PDU in this configuration (I cannot stress this enough).
I suspect these components may have caused an unspecified variation in line voltage during the switching process (from Source A to Source B, or vice versa) resulting in an out-of-specification low line voltage, magnifying the in-rush current into your TR PSU during turn-on (lower voltage, higher current) which has blown an input safety fuse in your PSU.
It’s dead, Jim.
I would caution you on opening the PSU and replacing the fuse yourself unless you understand proper electrical safety consideration and are experienced in such operations. Just because the PSU is unplugged does it mean those big input caps are fully discharged.
Your mistake was putting the UPS in front of the PDS (as a source). You should have put the UPS on the output of the PDS. There was no point in having the UPS as an input as both the direct input from the wall (via the surge protector – Source A) and the input from the UPS (via the surge protector - Source B) both ultimately derived from the same source (the wall). This does not provide for redundancy as Source A is Source B. You can label them “A” and “B” all you want but they were really “A” and “A” or “B” and “B”, certainly not “A” and “B”.
There really is no point in switching from a non-battery backup source to a backup-source as 1) if the wall power goes out, you’ve lost input to “both” sources, and 2) if the wall power goes out, the battery picks up the load (so what’s the point in switching over to a dead wall outlet?).
Redundancy is only achieved if “Source A” and “Source B” really truly are different sources (i.e., different circuits). And then only are you protecting for a failed circuit or a failure of the power line from the wall to the input of the PDU (which is a pretty damn unlikely scenario). I do not get the impression you gave this too much thought.
Because the restriction on the use of the PDU references the sources (and not the outputs), placing the UPS on the output would have been fine.
Now you know (and knowing is half the battle).