That is already the case, but it's entirely open source, based on the US-originary RedHat Linux, it's called Red Flag linux, and Fedora has made ARM a prime architecture just to satisfy the high demand for RedFlag Linux on ARM devices from China.
So it's a very good thing for the people in China, they love it, it's just a more recent version of RHEL for free and entirely in Chinese. The same happens in Russia, with Russian Fedora. The two largest markets in the world get to use for free what American companies are making, while at the same time, the Americans refuse to use Linux.
Americans are too used to being served, I don't really understand IT people saying things like "I have to use Windows because Premiere doesn't run on linux"... wow, that's just so wrong... especially from IT people... because almost every application in existence has been made a much better version of for linux, except maybe Premiere... and that says it all, it's because the users of Premiere prefer to be lazy and be served in exchange for money, than to develop their own open source software, because any way you look at it, if there is not a better application than Premiere on linux, that means that the Premiere users have been complacent and perfectly happy with their windows software consoles. The problem is that in the US, the marketing around linux depends to a large extent of this kind of complacent windows-users, they say they want linux, but they don't, they actually want to stay with windows. And IF they do something with linux, they go for McDonals-distros. And that's another part of the problem, in the US, most people think that Ubuntu or Mint or Debian ARE linux. But with .DEB distros, they can never get a really modern satisfactory desktop PC experience, so they are just reinforced in their false belief that Windows is actually better, whereas it doesn't even compare to linux, and whereas they can use Fedora for free, US made, free, China and Russia use it and tell the children to use it and learn it and master it... and the only thing that happens is that Intel, AMD, etc etc etc discard jobs in the US to hire people from China and Russia instead.
I don't get North-American that complain about corporations and capitalism and the powers that be, but at the same don't WANT to do anything about it, because they refuse to start the change themselves.
Europe is switching very fast, the UK is actually doing quite well also, the Mediterranean countries have been linux pioneers for a very long time, and so are the former Eastern Block countries and Eurasian countries. It's not just China and Russia that have their own distros, Turkey has had it's own distro for a very long time, it's called Pardus, and a lot of people start with that, and then move on to a more elaborate community distro, like Manjaro for instance, which is also very popular there. Germany is doing good, but not great in comparison to other European countries. Of all the European consumer markets, the German one has been influenced the most by the American consumerism, there is still a lot of Windows use amongst consumers and small companies.
The BSD foundation in Canada can't even pay their electrical bill, they are being choked to death in North-America. It's not anywhere looking good in North-America as far as Open Source is concerned in the consumer market. Americans just seem to complain but not do anything. With the NSA scandals and similar things, the evolution of the legal conditions relating to IT, one would think that everyone would run to open source to react, but they just don't, they keep using the very spyware that makes them into victims and that is blocking technology, technology that originates from the US, but is being leveraged outside of the US.
The US has an x86-based consumer (and enterprise) industry, but it's being slowly destroyed in the US itself, because consumers won't do anything to leverage the technology. That costs jobs, that bleeds money away from the North-American economies, etc..., but they'd rather buy Korean, European (ARM is UK based), and Chinese alternatives for x86 than do something about it with the tools that are provided for free. IBM made a linux watch in the 90's, that could basically do what 2013 Korean and Chinese watches can do, but nobody was interested. I think that it's very strange. How is it possible to complain about NSA spyware, but not switch completely over to linux or another open source operating system? How is it possible to complain about the quality of commercial games, but not support indie linux games, it's not that there aren't any available, in any bleeding edge distro's repos there are more than 400 free games just like that, that can be modded, forked, hacked, etc... and outside of the US, in Europe and Russia, small indie devs fork open source games and sell them commercially with great success in the US. In the US, nobody runs Sabayon, whereas Sabayon has the best implementation of Steam, with "SteamOS" Big Picture mode, and a lot of improvements to the performance of Steam, but people want to be able to buy SteamOS on a PC worth 400 USD in parts, for 1000 USD+ in stores, etc... while at the same time calling themselves "PC masterrace", and continuing to run the most constricting and limitative commercial software console ever, that basically makes the point of investing in PC performance hardware futile. I just don't understand it. Are people in the US so socially isolated that they don't have the opportunity to learn linux from someone? Is there functionality in Windows that is only available in the US that other countries don't get to see, and that makes Windows so great? Etc... I don't think so, so what the fuck is the problem then?