Hi everyone I'm looking to get 2 new 24" monitors to go with the one i already have and replace my very old 24". I was hoping to get ones that were Display Port ones that so when the next generation HBM2 video cards came out i would be all set. But the more i look the more i see only VGA and HDMI only connectors on the cheaper priced ones. I had thought VGA would have gone away by now considering video cards don't really support it any more. DVI i would have thought would have replaced that as the base connector.
So my question is, is it worth getting these monitors and just going from DP to HDMI? I don't need 4k just good 1080p quality monitors for CAD and Video rendering.
DP is not being implemented much because of legacy support. A tv only has HDMI because all of the devices that is supoosed to hook up to it only has HDMI
HDMI started appearing on consumer equipment around five years before Displayport was even introduced to the market. Because it uses identical signaling to DVI, it also served as an easily adaptable connector to legacy hardware.
DisplayPort has the same capabilities as HDMI and is overall a superior connector and interface, but it was too late to the party. By the time it arrived, HDMI had already taken over the market, and every television, DVD player and set-top box was using it.
DisplayPort is license-free, so companies like Dell and HP snapped it up in their business and corporate departments as fast as they could as soon as it appeared. That's why you see so many Dell and HP business machines with a DisplayPort connector, and why many of their business-grade monitors have DP connectors.
I understand that HDMI showed up before DisplayPort but its just sad to see that these monitors from these manufactures are only using VGA and HDMI on their monitors.
So It wont cause any problems getting these HDMI monitors and when i get a newer video card i can run an DP to HDMI cable and it will still work the same?
Yup. you can. Displayport can adapt to basically anything else except for dual-link DVI without an active adapter.
I have an R9 Nano. My only options are 3 DPs and 1 HDMI, but I run two DVI monitors off of DP adapters and a DL-DVI display straight from HDMI - That's the one single advantage that modern HDMI standards have over Displayport.
Perfect thank you I was going to veto getting the monitors just because they are HDMI but i think I'll get them on black Friday for $100 I can run everything off my 270X 4gig for now until Vega comes out with HBM2. then ill probably be going with at least an 8 gig version.
Samsung True LS24D300HL/ZA 23.6" LED Monitor, Black staples has them on black friday. I have a version of this one that is a few years older with VGA and DVI that i use on DVI and the quality is great. For a while i was going to go with a 32" led tv but the more i read the more i decided not to because i still do a lot of text stuff, and from what i have read text is hard to read on 1080p tv's. since im getting into programming and my 10 year old daughter uses my tower for her homework and her programming classes in school we need to be able to read text.
The reason VGA is still around is an easy answer. There are simply too many old computers in industries everywhere (and even brand new pc's) that have VGA support. To not have it available would detriment sales to a large consumer base.
display port is creeping in at the higher end, like 4k, 1440p high refresh rate, where many companies probably reuse board design and stuff from older models and just drop newer screens when talking old 1080p60
Yeah, can confirm that here in the enterprise; ALL of our touch screen business production monitors are DB-15 ONLY. 15x15, max resolution of 1280 x 720. And at 500$ a pop to boot. Thank god we are getting new ones that are 1920x1080, with HDMI and DB-15.