I’m putting together an AM5 build. It’s been in progress for over a month because when all the parts finally arrived and I put the basic system together and bench tested it, it didn’t work! First time this has happened (it’s true I tell you! I put together a 5950X and i9-12900 system last year and they’re working perfectly).
I bought a replacement motherboard - same unit - plus memory and a processor from a large well-known online retailer.
After swapping everything and replacing the original 7950X with a 7600X (least expensive Zen4 processor at the time) it looks like the original CPU is DOA. I’m attempting to RMA it.
So I have two motherboards and two sets of memory and an extra CPU. I’m not going to attempt to return the CPU (it’s been slathered with thermal paste, or thermal paté as they once said on GN) - I may ebay it - but I’m thinking of attempting to return the original motherboard and memory even though they seem to work OK. But I didn’t know that until I’d replaced everything in a quest to get the system working.
It seems that returning items that are already opened and tested is an acceptable protected consumer right, but personally I’m not normally in the habit of returning anything, and I feel in a bit of a moral quandary returning the items. Should I have bought replacements in the first place? I didn’t have an easy way to try and track down what the problem was (thanks in large part to inadequate debug facilities on the particular board I purchased, I feel) without swapping items and I didn’t have spare ones just sitting around.
So, would you attempt to return the items and get the money back, create a second machine, flog the parts on ebay etc., or stick them on a shelf in the hope that they could be put to good use in the future?
PS: The two systems that worked perfectly from the off both have POST codes, which of course were not required. Kind of Sod’s Law?