Not much to say about it yet.
Really?
Not unless you can notice 2 frames difference?
Well highly depends on the games then i guess.
Because most benchmarks i have seen a GTX1080 mobs the floor with it.
Unless Vulkan related titles like Doom maybe.
1 Like
Considering the price and age gap between the two you could maybe make an argument about that. I was more shocked about how well Fury cards are holding out especially at this resolution.
If I was buying a card now I think a Fury makes a good case.
Yes of course in terms of price to performance they do put up a good showing.
However that has not allways been the case.
Idk what a FuryX costs nowdays, but they were $650,- once.
The FuryX is still the most highend single gpu card that AMD has atm.
1 Like
I've only had a quick look at prices.
$250 for the non X.
$360 for it's bigger brother.
Some pretty impressive performance for not a lot of cash. The Fury really shouldn't be as good as it is.
1 Like
Yeah thats pretty cheap indeed.
Currious where the Vega cards will be sitting in terms of pricing.
I suppose we might see something like a X and non X version again.
From what I can tell Nvidia are offering well optimised DX11 chips and relay on higher frequency. That's not working for the other two API's and even some implementations of DX11. I think AMD might have gone down at better path.