(Unofficial Hopefully to be Official) Desktop Environment Opinions Thread

This is where you can dump your complete opinion about any Desktop Env in linux independent of your distro.. or if there is a distro specific thing with it post it...
ALL DE's accepted

My current setup is Ubuntu 15.04 Gnome
Opensuse Hard drive kicked the bucket and I am lazy :P

NO WARRING
and as always dont forget to like the thread if you posted :P i mean come on.. the thread needz the love man.. haha
anyways be detailed if you want.. detailed opinions are preferred due to them actually possibly being helpful

2 Likes

The best DE is no DE
WM only all the way.
i3 is nice, sometimes openbox or just xfcewm.
Awesome seems neat but I can't into lua. Spectrwm is nice too.

BSPWM all the way here. I love how configuration is all in bash so it's so easy to integrate, automate, and personalize to my workflow.

How is a thread about sharing opinions (worth reading) not going to descend into a flamewar at some point?

1 Like

I rather like KDE since it stupid customizable and can be either tiling or floating windows.

Normally I really just like using a terminal multiplexer like GNU Screen.

1 Like

I love Xfce to bits. Here's why I love Xfce:

  • It's so lightweight, and if you want to you can make it heavyweight. I prefer lightweight.
  • Base looks a bit ugly but can easily be made to look beautiful.
  • It's really modular.
  • Traditional or un-traditional, set it up how you want it. I prefer traditional with bar on top.
  • It's not bloated like some other DE, coming with a lot of software you probably won't use. Looking at you KDE.
  • One of the DE that really stands for freedom. A lot of the DE have pulseaudio and other strange dependencies that sometimes cause problems on some distros.
1 Like

Ehh who knows going okay for now

KDE because of looks.. but Cinnamon because its like gnome 2 and i like simple looks like that

I will list positives for multiple Desktop Enviroments and end with a negative for each.

Unity

  • The dash, press ALT and you can search through a programs menus,
  • The launcher, one click to launch any pinned program (like Windows 7)
  • Start menu only takes up a quarter of the screen.
  • Online search results enabled by default (can be easily disabled)

MATE

  • Modern form of the Gnome 2 Desktop environment
  • Light, similar resource usage to XFCE
  • Familiar yet unique.
  • Times have moved on.

Gnome

  • Highly customisable
  • Large amount of extensions
  • Jarring full screen interface and no minimise buttons by default (can be customised)

Cinnamon

  • Easy to pick up for Windows users
  • Good looking start menu
  • Easy theming
  • Not forward thinking enough

KDE

  • HIGHLY customisable
  • Familiar look to Windows users
  • Doesn't look as nice as the others by default

These are merely opinions. Hopefully we can keep these relatively elitist free.

3 Likes

I like Cinnamon being a primary windows user but currently I dont have a DE and havent been using one for 2 months? Works fine for me.

I've tried all the available desktop environments for Ubuntu/Debian while distro jumping before I recently settled down, I found that Unity and Cinnamon weren't very multi monitor friendly.

XFCE KDE and MATE however give you the option to create and customize panels out of the box, which is a huge plus for me personally. I like setting my main use display as default, so games open on that monitor, while still having full desktop functionality on my other monitor.

Gnome 3 is different however, games can open on my secondary monitor by default, and with Gnome 3's overlay I can very simply move the game over to my main display. I also really enjoy the extensions that are available with gnome.

It's honestly between xfce and and Gnome 3 for me, based purely off of functionality .

Well, here we go:
KDE Plasma 4

  • very configurable
  • very customizable
  • can look exceedingly nice
  • a tad heavy on system resources
  • my preferred desktop environment for the most part
  • I've been using KDE for 8 years now, I might be a tad biased
  • has a new version - KDE Plasma 5 - coming out soon that looks very promising
  • default config is extremely similar to Windows
  • default config is ugly
  • decent amount of extensions available - desktop and panel widgets, themes et cetera
  • has the Krita - dark colour theme, which I really like the look of
  • the KDE suite of applications is really nice and includes a lot of really great programs I use often, such as Krita as an alternative to GIMP (Krita being more to my taste as a long time Paint.NET and occasional GIMP 2.6 user), and Kate (a text editor that has a lot of functionality that Notepad++ has, plus some more on top).

XFCE

  • nice looking, but less heavy alternative to KDE
  • decently well configurable, not as many options as KDE
  • customizable to a greater extent than GNOME3

twm

  • really old feeling
  • doesn't look too great
  • very dependable, it'll always work
  • works on pretty much all devices imaginable

openbox

  • quite minimal, still has a lot of neat stuff I'm used to
  • basically like twm, but less of that "this is really fucking old" feeling

LXDE

  • basically openbox with a nice menu and taskbar and notification icon area attached
  • performs very well, looks alright, quite like it on older devices that also have to be used by other people from time to time

GNOME 3

  • looks nice
  • customizable as much as I usually need it to be
  • easy to use and pick up after someone presses the Win key for you and you understand what that does
  • seems to not like me
  • serious lack of configurable things in the settings menu, some stuff is flat out missing

GNOME 2

  • does not look terribly nice in my opinion
  • okay to use I guess
  • don't really like this one much, don't really passionately hate it either

awesome wm

  • quite minimal
  • have to start most things from the terminal
  • lots of keyboard shortcuts to learn (not really hard ones, but you have to learn them to be able to use awesome effectively)
  • quite fast to use once you get used to it I guess
  • not my kind of thing except on PCs that only have a single display such as laptops
  • lacks a lot out of the box, such as a network connection manager (nm-applet works) or a battery indicator

just the terminal, nothing else

  • no pictures, can't really get video
  • a bit hard for new users
  • fast
  • always works
2 Likes

Are window managers allowed?

Xmonad

  • Minimal
  • Its lightweight, highly customizable (more so than i3 atm for comparison)
  • It has nice defaults that are easy to pick up
  • Written in Haskell so you can pretty much plug-in anything all sorts of
  • Functionality Downside: its written in Haskell you need to rewire
  • Your brain to learn Haskell

Plasma 5 / KF5 (AKA KDE5)

  • MASSIVE improvement in default look and feel compared to KDE4
  • Much smoother
  • The control everyone loves with KDE
  • Nice work flow
  • KF5 is more modular than its predecessor, meaning less 'large' dependencies
  • Krunner is absolutely fantastic
  • Downside: applications are its still in quite a bit of development so its not feature complete

2 Likes