dd doesn’t know what files are, it just knows what sectors are.
With that in your mind you can also surmise that dd doesn’t know how big files are or how they are named or anything else. It just copies each sector, it doesn’t know or care about its contents. So when you copy a drive with dd it will copy everything, including empty sectors.
While copying this looks like it is “filling” the drive, but it is “filling” it with empty space that you can write to after it’s done.
Cloned usb worked but for the fact that I am only be able to access grub through the recovery options on a live cd, otherwise the computer goes straight to bios without the live usb in
I’m afraid my troubleshooting skills here may be limited, but I’m guessing you shrunk the partition to be copied and then issued the copy command outlined in the guide (with your own modifications), right?
First, is booting allowed from the emmcblk0 memory card?
What device is this in?
Can you post the output of fdisk -l /dev/sde with your original thumb drive inserted?
Can you post the exact dd command you used to clone the thumb drive?
Hi @TheCakeIsNaOH, I setup LAMP of Fedora 31 and installed Nextlcoud. I think if figured a lot of things out but now having some SELinux issues with ONLYOFFICE. I am pretty sure that this is SELinux and not DAC because everything works when I disable SELinux. But, with SELinux enabled, I am able to create and but not edit ONLYOFFICE documents. Further, I keep getting 2 SELinux AVC denials to x2t and ldd. It looks like they are being prevented from running. I am going through the Redhat documentation (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/security-enhanced_linux/chap-security-enhanced_linux-targeted_policy) and see there is a diference between files/directories and things that execute. Presumably, I should be able to [conde]semanage fcontext -m[/code] or semanage fcontext -a -t but I can’t. I am not sure how small of an issue this is so I figured that I try to keep it short (i.e., no error logs etc . . . ) and ask here first. Would it be better if I create a separate thread for this sort of thing?
I recently tried Manjaro Xfce and really like the theme, especially the color scheme. Does anyone know how I can get the same them of my Fedora Xfce? I am running Fedora 31.
PSA: You do not need the “non-free” repos to install ffmpeg on Fedora. The “free” repos work just fine…
Not sure why every tutorial and the tutorial author’s mother claims “non-free” is required, but it is not. Just verified with a friend and on my Fedora server.
Well shit. I fucked up my script again and can’t figure out what the hell the problem is. If I use the apache server to read Kickstart the install times out.
[ 17.617898] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): ens2: link is not ready
[ 17.620066] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device ens2
[ 19.616850] e1000: ens2 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX
[ 19.620898] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): ens2: link becomes ready
[ 80.907524] dracut-initqueue[981]: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
At this point.
If I pass the file directly it works. I tried using a Fedora ISO and when I went back to CentOS started having this issue. It has worked before.
If I click the link it opens the ks file. Nothing has changed except for this script. I thought all I did was change the ISO but apparently I did more than that. Fuck this is always so annoying.
Not sure what tutorials you’re referring to exactly, but from what I remember when I did it a year ago it just told me to enable rpmfusion repos in general, and didn’t specify if free or nonfree.
Also wouldn’t make sense because AFAIK nonfree is only for proprietary software. But ffmpeg is not proprietary, just the codecs are patented, which makes it not able to be in the main repos.
Yeah that’s what I mean, they don’t explicitly say you need nonfree, they just take the line from the rpmfusion documentation and go with it. At one point or another you’ll most likely need nonfree anyway, and just having it enabled doesn’t really hurt anything either.
I agree. Said friend is attempting to be one of those, uh, purists I guess. I told him I hope he plans on writing his own firmware and CPU lol.
Anyway, appreciate the sanity check. He asked me if “nonfree” was needed and I said no and he showed me all those links. So I tried it with “free” only and it worked.