No clue. Sorry.
ah well. figured Iād ask since you said you had experience with medium format
Anyone have experience with Sony gear? Iām looking for a wide-angle (10-14mm) e-mount lens with a 1.4 or 2.0 aperture.
Hard max is $800, but Iād much rather spend closer to $400.
Iām guessing that is for the APS-C sensors? The obvious one is the Samyang/Rokinon 12mm. Cheap (-ish), manual, f/2.0, optically ok. I think L1T is or was filming a lot of stuff with that lens on the Panasonic side.
The luxury variant would be the Zeiss Touit 12mm f/2.8. The problem is that that is not really a great lens. It is pretty good but has some flaws optically (itās better than the samyang but not by much). It has autofocus but only on contrast AF. It has a manual focus ring but that is by wire.
Overall ā¦ not worth the money.
I actually have no idea what Sony itself has in that rangeā¦
1 Like
Yeah, sure is.
Howād I miss that one!? Thatās looking like an excellent option.
It seems like super-wide lenses are pretty edge-case on full frame.
seconded on samyang/rokinon, great for the money, cine lens variant is just as good but you probably donāt need it for that
1 Like
On full frame VoigtlƤnder has a couple ultrawides, down to a 10mm actually. 
that 10mm f/.95 is a joy to work with. Getting zebras at night is a powerful feeling and itās tack sharp
1100 bucks tho
ā¦ for m4/3. Not full frame.
Iām talking about this one:
ah, my bad. yeah never shot with that one
still $1100 tho
Does anyone here have a line on decent OFX effect plugins that donāt gost a thousand bucks?
working on a new video project:
@noenken wondering if you have a recommendation on stabilized full frame prime lenses in the 40-60mm range.
cant be E-mount, Z mount, L mount or R mount but otherwise i can use it, s35 and aps-h are also useable but not ideal.
Donāt care about fast apertures as long as it does f 2.8 constant and breathes the same or less than the nifty 50
mechanical stops for focus nice but not an absolute need, AF optional but probably there anyway if its got stabilization
Currently looking at this one (sigma sells it as apsc but it has aps-h coverage):
Iād rather have a prime or a longer zoom if available for under 1000 though
Oooph. So that leaves you with Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K and Sony A mount lenses, right? Everything else is just too old to be stabilized, I think.
I was never a Canon or Pentax shooter, I had one Sony A camera and I didnāt know shit back then and I havenāt really looked at Nikon stuff in years. ā¦ I donāt think I can help you there. 
I also never got into video. I tried a little, got some gear and all but itās just not my medium. I like stills.
Iām guessing you want to speedboost something onto a Black Magic?
PL, ENG mounts and p4 are fine too
also sigma SA, fuji GFX, m42 and any bigger format active mount
not speedboost but adapt, have an older model cine cam that doesnāt have a quick change close flange system
they donāt really make stabilized cine lenses, this is for a special purpose steadicam application
What is the sensor size on that?
s35, so too big for anything but sigma aps-c lenses (they often have larger image circles than advertised because their engineers obsess over corner sharpness and they sell an aps-h body themselves)
Sorry, in this case Iām pretty much useless unfortunately. I did see something about a Tamron 45mm stabilized lens a while ago. But I have no idea if that fits the bill.
it very much might. basically just looking for portrait-ish focal length on a 1.35x crop that will handle hand pans/trucks well
wait a sec, this one?
I think this is the one nikon sued tamron over for VR patent infringement lol
electronic aperture only may be an issue though, lemme check if anyoneās tried this with the EF adapter I have