Supercomputer models one second of human brain activity

Stolen from the WAN show

The most accurate simulation of the human brain to date has been carried out in a Japanese supercomputer, with a single second’s worth of activity from just one per cent of the complex organ taking one of the world’s most powerful supercomputers 40 minutes to calculate.

Thoughts?

I just have one concern: I hope that brain simulation doesn't become the basis for AI development as our computing power increases. I wouldn't want my fridge or car to be based on the human mind.

3 Likes

I would love for that to be in video games.

I really enjoy living at this time - where technology and science advances so fast. Cant wait to see stuff thats in our everyday lives 30 years from now :)

705,024 processor cores and 1.4 million GB gets you 1% of brain but 40 minutes for 1 second.

Please do the math for real-time human IF 100% scaling

144000 seconds in 40 minutes

lol, nope. 2400 seconds in 40 minutes. 144000 seconds is 40 hours!

The computation is still rule-based, when chips become logical then we can talk about silicon vs brains

1 Like

please do ALL the math

Then find out about supercomputer scaling then take that into account

Well, according to moore's law, if we need 2400x the processing power, it'll take about 11-12 years (2^11 is 2048, 2^12 is 4096). I'm probably wrong. Someone'll point out some flaw in my math or have some sort of more creditable hypothesis.

Well I think modeling the human brains pattern recognition is the first step to creating true AI. The machines won't have the emotional baggage that we human beings do.

2400x needs extra 00 on the end as it was only 1% of human.

BUT

A worldwide fiber network . . . big brain

And silicone will be dead soon enough.

18 years then (2^18 = 262144). I'm still probably wrong. I can sense it. There's something fishy about this math.

This.

Oh, I somehow missed that it was "just one percent". I don't really think that you can have a 1% of a brain, since it's a complex organ that really needs to be a whole to function.

I think that's a clickbait article, and what really happened is that they just ran a simulation on an unspecific neural network that roughly corresponds 1% of the brain's neural network's size. The Telegraph doesn't have a link to any more sophisticated source, so I'm going to wait until a more science oriented publication reports on this.

You should note that I don't know what I'm talking about.

No, That's a car engine ,Brain can still do stuff even when if it's not all there. :)

When they put a brain in a robot with the 3 laws. :)

Seriously though, video game AI that implements a real brain would be cool.