You need to explain your post to me.
Nvidia launched the 2080 at the same price (AIB cards not counting), included āfeaturesā wich are used in 1 game and 1 benchmark and everyone loves it.
Now in old AMD tradition, AMD put a card with a little higher powerdraw (15 to 25W) at the same price as Nvidia and about the same performance in games and a lot better performance in productivity and everyone hates it.
Does not compute with me.
Given its a slightly nobbled instinct chip, i was hoping.
Either way, maybe when supply sorts itself out i might grab one and offload one of my 64s to a mate.
MY response to AMD:
Hi there
Given that the product is now released and none of the promo
material mentions anything to do with SR-IOV is it possible to get
some answer from engineering or such?
Iām expecting a no, but if nothing else, hopefully this is registered as āinterestā in consumer SR-IOV for the future.
This card is REALLY interesting if you need FP64 in OpenCL. As in holy shit batman interesting.
The closest competitor of this card is the Titan V, and that thing is 3000 USD, not 700-800. Plus this thing has even more memory bandwidth, and 4 GB more memory than the Titan V.
I am seriously considering buying a Radeon 7 in the next 2 years, purely for FP64 OpenCL compute. Gotta learn OpenCL first, but I have a lot of FP64 code that could probably be rewritten for GPUs.
PS: This card has 1/4 rate FP64, so around 3.5 TFLOPS. Most other consumer cards have 1/8, 1/16 or 1/32 rates. The Titan V has 1/2, the old Kepler based Titans have 1/3, and Tahiti cards have 1/3. So pretty much the Titan V is the only competition for this card.
It is not the performance jump I am looking forward to, it is the price/performance that I want.
The current cards from both sides are either entry to midrange or extremly high-end. I need a replacement for my R9 Fury due to the 4GB limitation, but do not want to spend >500ā¬ in doing so.