wich of these cards do you like more ?
and wich of the two do you think is beter at price preformance?
and what do you expect what nividia will do ?
and what do you think the GTX 780 TI will do to this or effect this?
how do you think about this ? ( first video i could find whit 4K benchmark )
he sorry but i couldn't find a english version go to 11:32 there are the stats
Personally I'd go 780, but that could all change when non reference 290x cards come out and we can see how well they overclock.
Lots more views and fanboi comments here:
https://teksyndicate.com/forum/gpu/amd-290x-king-hill/157677
At this time, it could still depend on your choice of games. The 780 would be faster and less buggy in games like Total War.
In cross platform, console ported games, the 290x will be faster. People are complaining about thermal performance and noise performance of the 290x. Not sure if that bothers you.
ugh mai god please read the reviews and make up your own damn mind.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7457/the-radeon-r9-290x-review
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2013/10/23/amd_radeon_r9_290x_video_card_review#.UmkooxByaqc
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-R9-290X-Hawaii-Review-Taking-TITANs
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/63742-amd-radeon-r9-290x-4gb-review.html
o i was just intrested in other peoples opinions about this topic
yes well im sorry for my reaction but there are like 5ty billion threads about it already.
don't blame ya, it's a good card.
I want the 290x!! I would love to use it for heating up my room at the upcoming winter. I love the blower/exhaust types. They really heat up the place!
I also have noise canceling headphones which I put on no matter the situation.
Neither, wait for the partner boards of the 290x and the 780Ti, then choose after the benchmarks are out and the price changes have happened.
i cant wait to put my AIO cooler on the R9-290x!!
I would currently pick up a 780 if i could, but I think once they release the AM cooler models I would definitely consider it. right now I think I'm going to be just fine with a R9-280X
I would obviously get a 290x. It's equal or faster than the Titan(According the majority of reviewers). It's also 450$ cheaper. It should be faster in compute programs also (didn't see much of those numbers).
Even with the horrid cooler, that can be fixed with an aftermarket cooler or water-block. I'm not in the market for a new GPU now, so I'd be okay with waiting for the non-reference cards, but AMD really is pushing the market forward. Obviously, this card is launching 50$ more than the 7970 did, but the way NVidia is pricing their cards... It makes NVidia look like Apple (good marketing/keynotes/high prices/lots of customers).
Please compare the 290x to its direct competitor the 780GTX, the Titan is just a compute card and isn't really designed for games and it's pricing is just stupid :)
The 780 is faster than the Titan, also.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djvZaHHU4I8
1440p and lower 780
1440p and higher 290x
stock clock 290x
over clocked 780
The 290x is cheaper so it might be the better pick but the numbers I am seeing right now are all over the place. I would wait and see how things unfold in the next few weeks when more people get there hands on the 290x and the 780ti is release.
The 780 is basically a compute card also, just Nvidia cripples the performance in compute just so they can charge $350 more for the Titan.
Let me know if you find any GPU accelerated benchmarks.
Please compare a 290x with a water block vs the 780 with a stock cooler. That way, they are the same price and no temp bottleneck.
I agree. Stock for stock the Titan is in fact faster. But without locked voltages, the 780 does win after overclocking.
I'd buy 2 R290 X gpus and just not buy any gas to heat my flat probably work out cheaper than buying gas >_> lol.
But in all seriousness i think the 290x may have some overclocking potential when we see the aftermarket cards...why in the world AMD have not let anyone do a aftermarket cards (antil dec) is beyond me the card is obviously struggling with the crazy heat its outputing at the moment top over clocks have been just under 1100mhz and thats just sad.
In my opinion this card is just not worth buying in its current state anless you just whant to bilud a uber water cooled AMD only flashy look at me rig.
yeah current OC stuff looks a bit disappointing, although i do like the new method of clocking they are implementing, perhaps its just a case of driver support and learning the best why to clock using this different method thats restricting it (along with the cooler).