We need more OpenGL Linux Benchmarks! Post them here! UPDATED: 2018
Presets: Fullscreen - 1080p - Quality High - Ambient Occlusion ON - Volumetric Shadows ON - Motion Blur ON. Everything else was OFF.
Gtx 970:
After upgrade:
R9 285:
UPDATE:
RX Vega 56 (2560x1440 - Ultra Settings)
RX Vega 56 (1920x1080 - Ultra Settings - Shadows disabled)
Dont know how to run the test?
Here is a little tutorial:
First go to download (Valley or Heaven) > : http://unigine.com/en_us/products/benchmarks/valley/
The download is a .run file, so it needs permission to run. There are several ways to do this im sure, easiest method is: Right Click it > Properties > Permission > Allow this file to run as a program.> Run or Paste it into terminal > After installation, change directory to the installed bin folder. Type cd (bin directory of valley, then enter ./browser_x64 -config …/data/launcher/launcher.xml and run the benchmark.
Good Luck!
Dont know what linux/nivida has done to you but i just demolished your 970 (same setings as you posted) with a 4 year old HD7950 (i am useing winblows tho)
This not a topic on Windows, (Should have added that)
If i were using Windows, i would be expecting double the performance or more
I would love to see, how your 7950 does under Linux though. With the AMD Proprietary drivers
We should all use the same graphics settings (aside for resolution). What settings did you use?
if i get time to day i might swap out the gpu in to my debian work horse and see.
But thats bad realy that 1/2 the open gl performance is lost just because of the OS typically AMD cards tend to be better in the open gl/open cl area.
I definetly agree!
Updated the thread with presets now.
Presets: Ambient Occlusion ON - Volumetric Shadows ON - Motion Blur ON. Everything else was OFF.
Would be awesome to see some numbers on it
Really wonder if the AMD performance is even or better
Linux comparison for you.... Not quite 1080 - was using an old Apple Cinema display and that's the max res. Everything is stock - nothing overclocked. GPU running about 70c during the test and fans started up but fairly quiet
I'm on a laptop, so no 1080p, and the 850m is not really a 1080p card. The GPU and CPU are all at stock clock and memory speed.
@Bruger I bet that with newer drivers (like mine) and with kernerl 4.1.x you'd get better performance. A 970 (at 1080p) destroys a 850m at (768p)
@Bruger - 346.82 - drivers sound quite old....?
Yep, he should upgrade.
That 980 tho. My GPU ran at 74° on a laptop :D
Thanks but the 1080p really does make a big difference, but still thanks for your input
Ye, im using the Drivers from the Driver Manager (Linux Mint)
Have not tried the, newer ones yet
Thanks everyone for posting!
This way we can compare kernels, drivers and different graphic cards. Awesome!
But try to keep it at 1080p (If possible)
Yes the 980 is a little over-specced for my fave game - European truck simulator. Get 110-160fps on that at this res lol. Need a 4k monitor to make it work a bit harder!
So after doing apt-get upgrade (Same Driver Version 346.82)
A few more pixels to deal with than my 980 - seems reasonable in comparison
But same kernel and same driver version yet more than twice as quick....? Still a good result!
1 Like
Now i want to see some AMD results
If someone does not come up with some soon, ill have to do it myself :))
1 Like
What a jump. What did you upgrade?
