I asked over at inbox.exe and got a limited response, maybe I will get better response in this forum...
Onto my question, I am in the market for a laptop and want to use photoshop on it, (cs6, and I have used it very little) I wish to know whether a graphics card makes a difference for photoshop, I also heard that it is accelerated using openGL (or was it CL?) which is muich better on AMD cards, yes? also do I even need to have a graphics card or was I just lied to and would a cpu only setup be fine?
I dont know if photoshop takes advantage of cuda or opencl better but yes putting a good cpu and a good graphics card should speed up photoshop a lot compaired to just a cpu alone. I am also no expert on adobe products so hopefully someone else will help.
GPU's do improve photoshops performance but you only notice it with a good GPU. In my opinion I think it's better to invest more money into the CPU only if the sole purpose of the laptop is for ps and not gaming.
My ASUS G71 doesn't do to bad in Photoshop. It only has a Core 2 Duo and 6Gb of DDR2 but the acceleration I get with my GTX 260m makes it run pretty smoothly.
honestly i've done quite a bit of photoshop on multiple machines, and i cannot tell a difference, everything gets done in a fraction of a second regardless of if i'm on a 8320/7870 or a core 2 duo/intel gma 950
cs6 isnt opencl accelerated, i think its only the new adobe creative cloud stuff that is.
It is opengl accelerated so you get super smooth panning / zooming of the workspace even on pretty low end nvidia and ati cards.
rather annoyingly you will find awesome videos online of apu opencl demonstrations in premiere / photoshop which *seem* too be running on v6 from amd and a couple of other sources but adobe decided not to implement on the final release.
I dont know why - maybe it just wasnt stable at that point in time or maybe because adobe were being arseholes.
Pretty much everything in photoshop is multithreaded so the more cores the better.