Out of these 3 X79 boards, pick your best for my needs

So, I happen to have enough money to switch to another X79 motherboard; my current one is riddled with unreliable usage, but there have been so many upsides to it; including the C606 chipset it's actually using, meaning that there's an extra 8 SAS ports, of which all can be operated as a SATA protocol, taking the total usable internal SATA ports up to 14. That aside, the Intel NIC that it has kinda wants to stay put asleep after booting it from cold or warm, so I had to go into Device Manager and attempt to revive it. This could be the time when the BIOS flash could've corrupt its ROM, so I am not even bothered to pursue the fix for it and decided to move on.

So, as for my following planned X79 boards (which all actually uses the X79 chipset for once), what's your pick for me?

First one is the ASUS X79-E WS.

Reasons I would like this board: This is a workstation-graded board, so it has some extra features that primarily businesses and enterprises use, including 2x high quality Intel I210 NICs, TPM and COM header and even an internal USB port, not a front panel header, which it would've been but in this case converted into a port. It is the most expensive but what do you expect for a motherboard built for stability 24/7? Oh, and it even has a PS/2 port, perfect when you have older keyboards; not many boards today would have this which is shameful.

Second option is the EVGA X79 Dark.

Reasons for this board: It's made by EVGA, so expect superior warranty and support. 2x Intel NICs, but not the same as the previous one, lots of overclocking features, so a good bench for my 3970x CPU. Downsides are; no PS/2 port, what a pity EVGA, and the theme overall seems really flamboyant, out the 3. Plus, has EVGA lately been concentrating less on the quality of the components they are using to manufacture their products? This is after reports their lower end X79 boards suffers from issues relating to build quality.

On a foot note, Amazon doesn't have it in their stock but EVGA still does and at a cheaper price.

Third option is the ASUS Rampage IV Black.

Reasons: Would be a nice alternative to the EVGA board, in terms of features, like that PS/2 port (insert Spongebob stares) and the theme is much less flamboyant, while retaining the wide range of overclocking features. And also an onboard Wifi/Bluetooth; my current board has those features but the come separately on a PCIe card. Downsides:
One Ethernet port (but a reduction by one would save some space on the rear I/O panel, would it?), price is a bit steep and the slowly redundant ROG branding.

As far as usage goes, I happen to do mostly high end stuff like 3D modelling, multimedia editing, running lotsa VMs and muh games. I also would like to do some brilliant overclocking, like 4.5GHz or above, so I think that would rule out the X79-E WS as a possibility for that task.

So yeah, all 3 are high ends and that's how I want to roll for a while. No point in upgrading to X99 unless I needed DDR4, more PCIE lanes, power efficiency and native USB3/SATA3. And as you can see, 2 boards for the lower level consumer market and the first option, a board for the higher end market, for stability but it seems overclocking can be done on it. I usually don't go for the reviews on Amazon but maybe you people have inputs on my options. And this is how I want to roll for a while, as my wish.

I'd go for the WS board. Its just plainly built better then a gaming oriented board. Dual Gigabit nics, tons of pcie x8 and x16 lanes, plus workstation grade reliability. It doesn't have all the flamboyant styling the ROG board does, or the little features that clutter the Evga and ROG, but what it does do is perfectly execute the basics. You get some small stuff features, but what you do get is reliability and compatibility, unmatched by any gaming oriented board. I really value that over the tiny, sometimes really gimmicky things you find on a ROG board or Evga gaming board.

*

Hey there, I own rampage iv black , so I can answer few questions. First one I got burned when I run xmp enabled 2133 ram. Got a replacement fast and working fine. Yest ,it is expensive, it has a lot of features not needed for a regular user, mostly oc stuff and oc panel in the box , which makes it even more expensive. I have 4960x, used to run at 4.6-4.7 at 1.4 volt cool but as you can see , its watercooled.I ran raid 0 ssds on onboard controller for a year , without any problems. It has plenty of pcie slots and lanes with proper cpu. It has some nice software for overclocking in windows if you need some extra power and dont want to use bios . Bios is great, feature rich and easy to navigate.Dual bios chips help If you want to update bios without fear.It has a tpm header and modules are sold separatly. Great manual sometimes helps.Oh and OMG! IT IS NOT RED like rest of rog stuff :D But if you get bad cpu , it wont help with oc :) Also you can use intel nvme ssds for video editing, cache or system, with a proper setup I managed to use 750 as a bootable drive but only under win 8. So there is no need to get x99 platform for nvme. But the price is still high, most people pay premium for stuff they wont use. I use mine in a htpc/tv gaming rig as my main pc is x99 based,oh uv reactive sleeving looks darker on pcs ;p


*

I think that the WS board would realy be a good choice.
However it will of course lack a bit on overclocking feutures.
But i think if you do allot of modeling stuff etc, you will most likely not botter too much with overclocking.
Because you likely prefer stability and reliability over a few more Mhz's

Maybe the Sabertooth isnt a bad choice either, but that highly depends if its offering enough connectivity for you needs.

I haven't got to the deepest 3D modelling but it seems the cards are on the WS. From what I heard from owners, it can at least achieve some degree of overclocking, although it is usually not a wise choice to have an overclocked CPU while rendering videos, 3D projects, etc.

As for X99, I am convinced to just jump onto that boat but the requirements gets even higher, meaning more money has to be spent. And I already knew the price just for the X79-E WS and although it is extremely steep brand new professional quality would mean more reliability. Too bad my Gigabyte board was meant to aim at that market but Gigabyte essentially took the shortcuts when making this board, hence, intermittent problems and one that effectively rendered the Intel NIC almost unusable.

But anyway, further inputs - especially on the X99 architecture - are appreciated.

Yeah well, i´m personaly not realy a fan of Gigabyte boards in general.
They allways seem to cause headaches some way or the other.

i think that i would go with the Asus X79 WS aswell.

I like the EVGA board. It has tons of features yet isn't over the top and the aesthetic is amazing.