OMV - NFS Share Problem

Software & Operating Systems Linux
1

Hello All,

I am setting up OMV for a couple of NFS shares however when I try to mount them it appears the first share that is created is being mounted for each mount regardless of whats specified when executing the mount command.

Google’Fu has not produced anything other than it should just work, any ideas or experience with this issue??

Thanks,

c2cahoon

[MPFGA-HOST01]# mount 192.168.3.211:/export/numba1share /opt/numba1mount
[MPFGA-HOST01]# mount 192.168.3.211:/export/numba2share /opt/numba2mount
[MPFGA-HOST01]# mount | grep 192.168.3.211
192.168.3.211:/export/numba1share on /opt/numba1mount type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=524288,wsize=524288,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.3.211,mountvers=3,mountport=37782,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.3.211)
192.168.3.211:/export/numba1share on /opt/numba2mount type nfs (rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=524288,wsize=524288,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=192.168.3.211,mountvers=3,mountport=37782,mountproto=udp,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.3.211)
2

Found a bug reported for the issue however the fix doesn’t seem to be working. At least I know the cause of the issue.

3

5.x is still theoretically beta. A lot of problems…

4

Sadly I talked a friend into migrating to OMV from FreeNAS and it’s been a train wreck ever since. He went with a 4.x release of OMV and was able to import his array and setup shares with no issues.

Yay Betaduction software!!

5

I ask out of curiosity, why?

Personally, I use OMV 4.x but only on ARMv7. For x86, I’d rather choose freenas or unraid.

OMV 5 will officially appear as stable after the next Debian release, i.e. some 10.1
It should be remembered that OMV is really a project behind which there is only one person, only one ex freenas dev.
Another person is responsible for some plugins but he is not officially omv dev.

You can also go directly to their forum with questions… But after Thomas Kaiser left the project, the technical level in the forum decreased.

6

He wanted something more flexible than FreeNAS in terms of being able to expand his pool size. Unraid was the first choice but in his setup the NAS is virtualized with a passthrough HBA and virtual unraid setups appear to be fairly sketchy.

The great news is he is splitting storage and compute now so he’ll be moving to unraid for his big pool and then using freenas for his lab activities.