http://cpuboss.com/
currently a hot button topic
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-vs-AMD-FX-8350
meh.you really cannot say one cpu is better than another. some are better than others at different tasks.
I agree just thought this might help some people choose depending on their needs.
not quite sure why everybody keeps spamming the 8350 but the 8320 is a FAR better CPU for the value
the only difference between the two is that the 8350 has slightly higher stock clocks, but they can both be overclocked to 4.5-5.0 ghz easily
Did not intend to spam this is this sites take on your statement.
http://cpuboss.com/cpus/AMD-FX-8350-vs-AMD-FX-8320
(no offense is intended)
Good find, I checked it out and the comparison screens are pretty cool + the UI is dead sexy.
Commisar: it looks like they give you tools to rank CPUs by different criteria. I agree that it's hard to give an 'overall score' that is all encompassing but at least there's a pretty good breakdown that shows how different cpus vary along specs or benchmark performance. I think it's got potential once they do a bit of tweaking.
that dosent really show much besides what i said
the only difference between the two is price and stock speeds
actually, the 8320 and the 8350 are made on the same line, but 8350's that don't bin to adequate standards are downclocked and sold as 8320; hence, an 8350 will OC better than an 8320
not according to overclock.net or any other site
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=722267
8320 requires more voltage for the same clock as the 8350.
It's not like the 8320 is way less expensive either. Amazon has it listed at just $23 less, and that half GHz under clock makes a big difference. If it was $140 then maybe that's a worthwhile trade off, but $20 isn't going to make the difference if you're looking at high end components.