New To Linux so Need a lot of HELP!

ok so i just installed linux on a pc with the specs below

Intel p4

intel mobo

nvidia geforce 5500 

ok lets start from the begining:

1)I downloaded Ubuntu 12.10

2)burned the iso with windows disc image burner

3)installed it 

4)had login problems(later found the problem)

5)was trying to have fun with linux but was more laggy then windows xp why?

so my question is why is it so laggy for my pc. Is it because of the specs? Maybe because the way i burned it? I also have 2 more windows on the same hdd maybe because of that? 

 

TY for reading and any help would be appricated

try lubuntu or xubuntu or bodhi or puppy linux

those are the only one i found to be working better then xp on my pentium 4

and

that is laggy because ubuntu 12 was not made to be run on an pentium 4

and can u  tell me how u fixed that login problem i had same issues in the past with ubuntu 10

I'm under the impression your specs are indeed a bit lackluster for Ubuntu 12.10. Ubuntu 12.10 is a modern OS; Windows XP is, debatably, not.

However, what is probably affecting your performance is your hard drive. You said you have 2 Windows installs on the same drive. This means that you probably installed your Ubuntu after those Windows installs. If you install gparted from the Ubuntu Software Center, you can see how it maps your hard drive as a rectangle from left to right. This corresponds to your hard drive in real life. The farther to the right something is in gparted, the farther towards the center of your hard drive it is installed, and the slower those parts of the hard drive spin. 

Therefore, if you only have one hard drive, the best configuration would be to put your preferred OS  FIRST on the disk.

That being said, and judging by the rest of your specs, it looks like your drive is small, old, and slow, which is bad news for any beefy OS.

My advice on this topic, then, is that if you are serious about performance in Ubuntu, you purchase a hard drive where you can install it first. Switching its position on your current drive with Windows installs is probably way more trouble than it's worth.

I have Puppy linux running on a Pentium 4, and it of course runs remarkable well. Even Xubuntu will only fare 'okay' on a machine such as yours.

yeha for me the login problem disappeared after i turned cap lock on. Sorry not much help but don't know why it did that. i did not have the cap lock on while i typed the password and the username.

Alright i will try to frmat te hdd and try installing ubuntu linux and if that does notwork then maybe previous versions of linux should do the trick. But i would also like to know if  lubuntu, xubuntu,bodhi, or puppy linux are faster then windows xp?

Results vary, but I'm sure no one here will disagree when I advertise to you that Puppy for example will indeed be noticeably faster than XP. If you are referring to boot times, then Any linux distro will blow XP out of the water.

id go with crunchbang if i was you its a lot faster than ubuntu

are your geforce drivers even install though that would make a big difference and you could enable compositing

im running crunchbang on shittier hardware than you no gfx drivers p4 and there is minimal lag at 800x600 but anything higher and it shits the bed

i know its not really considered a noob distro by some but openbox is so fast and not that hard to learn

otherwise lubuntu

Zorin OS Lite, your welcome

Linux Mint 11 "Katya" - LXDE (32-bit)  http://www.linuxmint.com/edition.php?id=87

This runs very nice its ubuntu without the "ubuntu faults"

System requirements:

x86 processor

256 MB RAM

3 GB of disk space

Graphics card capable of 800×600 resolution

CD/DVD drive or USB port

Puppy is very nice but not to use every day (i have a copy of puppy on my 4gb usb stick i use to fault find on broken down computers)

Ok... umm.

The only issue Hotshot1019 you are really having is UNITY

The most god awful Desktop Enviorment since windows 3.1

It's poorly designed and way to reasource expensive.

I wouldn't even suggest default debian simply because Gnome 3 isn't much better.

 

YOu need XFCE, you can actually download it for your current installation.

or you can grab Xubuntu, which loads XFCE by default.

And if you need something lighter, LXDE

And try Peppermint OS 3 www.peppermintos.com

It's 500mb's, fits on a CD, uses ubuntu/mint's repo's, and small, great, and easily customizable.

Some one suggested crunchbang #!, which I like as well, it's pretty light and extremely popular with folks with lower end systems.

1st question specs 

RAM ?

CPU ?(I see you said pentium 4 but which one, or What is the Ghz )
 

2nd it is does not matter if you have windows on other partiotion


3rd did you enable Nvidia driver (if you do not member  go to unity(dash home) and type driver(if it can not find it go to "ubuntu software center" and search and install "additional drivers" open from unity(dash home))) and you should see nvidia propritery driver activate it this should remove any lagging hopfully

remember ubuntu 12.10 is really resource hungry O.S.(i know am using it)
 

Ubuntu 12.10 is arguably the worst of Canonical, you're much better of with 12.04 LTS if it has to be Ubuntu.

However, Ubuntu is arguably not the most representative of the quality/stability/security/userfriendliness of GNU/Linux. It's a lot like Windows in many aspects, relatively old and relatively slow.

On an older machine, you'll have much more fun running a fast GNU/Linux distro, like Arch or Slackware, but those two in vanilla form are pretty hard to handle for a user without experience. A Pentium 4 is still a pretty fast machine for Puppy Wary, if you like Puppy Racy that would be an alternative, but a P4 is plenty fast for a modern full functional state of the art GNU/Linux distro like Manjaro Linux for instance. Manjaro is the rising star of GNU/Linux, the standard version comes with XFCE, which is nice and fast and full-featured, but you can also have other desktop environments if you like, as with all GNU/Linux distros.

Manjaro is based upon Arch Linux, so it has the benefit of being a rolling cutting edge release (without the downsides of Arch itself because unstable packages are filtered out because they use their own repos), it has a vivid community, it is fully compatible with Arch and the AUR, which contains an incredible amount of software and is really easy to use.

Since Manjaro version 0.8.2, it has been thriving, and is considered a must-install on both somewhat older and less capable machines for a speed upgrade, and on modern machines for supersonic speed, and it just looks good and works out of the box. By the end of this year, they plan on coming out of beta, but in reality, this distro feels less like beta than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and it just flies on older hardware or netbooks. The install assistant has much less graphical bling than Ubuntu, in fact it's only pseudo-graphical, but it is very easy to use and a lot less confusing than Ubuntu.

However, if you want the best of GNU/Linux, (maybe it will run fast enough on your older PC, you could at least try it) get Fedora 18 with the standard Gnome Shell, and install Fedora Utils and get some Shell Extensions. With Fedora Utils, you can install some expansions and necessary software and do some maintenance and setup fully automatically, fully within a GUI, and in only a few minutes. The combination of the bleeding edge features of Fedora, it's stability, it's professional community, it's backing by Red Hat, IBM, Intel, etc, with the added ease of use of the new Anaconda installer (easier than a Mac), the great Gnome Shell 3.6 (much better than any Mac or any Windows), the Linux kernel 3.8, the great Fedora Utils application, the best package manager of all GNU/Linux distros (Yumex aka Yum Extender), it's legendary security, and it's endless compatibility with various hardware, is just ultimate win in my opinion.

All has been said, but in plain English:

Ubuntu is the operating system, Unity is the desktop environment.  Think about it like in Windows, Windows hasn't really changed enormously from XP to 7, however XP was themed with "Luna" whereas 7 is themed with "Aero".

If you tried to somehow run Aero on an XP machine it would run like a bag of crap because 10 year old hardware isn't designed to support it.  Same holds true for Unity, which is based on Gnome 3.(x).

Linux has lots of other Desktop environements you can try which have already been mentioned.

  • Unity - Ubuntu 12.10 default which people either love or hate.
  • Gnome - Unity is based on Gnome, and if you hate Unity you'll likely hate Gnome 3 as well.
  • Mate - A fork of Gnome 2, should be resource unintensive.
  • KDE -  Old one and a good one, paralells the Windows metaphor in a lot of ways.
  • Cinamon - Introduced from Linux mint (I think?), very similar to the Windows metaphor.
  • Xfce - Light desktop.
  • Lxde - Lighter desktop.


Probably a bunch I haven't mentioned. I don't claim to be an expert in any of them, I've used almost all a little and none a lot, couldn't tell you which will be best for the old hardware.  Go have a look and see which looks best suited.  Installation is generally a breeze, as simple as opening a terminal and:

sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop

Sometimes a little bit more, but never challenging.  You can put several on if your machine can take it.  To swtich between them, on the log in screen just click the little Ubuntu logo and: