Apparently it’s hip in Sweden and I liked some of the parts I read like storage-less servers (so I guess they load software to ramdisk and remove boot media or similar), not that I take it as watertight but a nice addition.
Any thoughts on them?
Not that many exit countries so if you want Netflix Espaniol you’re out of luck.
Reading through some of the technical stuff they seem to know what they are talking about. Though I would personally have a couple of questions about the ramdisk they are running.
They don’t seem to have exit nodes in countries not already under massive surveillance which is concerning.
Personally, I’ve used Private Internet Access which has been good for the most part. But p2p and torrenting is kinda fucked. But they have a ton of exit nodes!
Sounds like a stateful firewall issue. As a firewall (or anything doing NAT) needs to known what is returning traffic and where to send it, a state table allows for traffic you’ve requested to not get blocked when returning and also get sent to the right place. However, as torrenting opens multiple connections with multiple endpoints it sounds like there is a limit being imposed by PIA on their end (likely to prevent resource hogging or QoS for other users).
So if you haven’t seen this https://thatoneprivacysite.net/ you should check out some of these VPN services and see what all you care about before selecting one thats “hip” in a certain country.
Also, ovpn is a type of protocol and many services allow you to simply download their certificate and the raw .ovpn files so you can implement your VPN at the level which suits you.
I’m not sure about the heuristic used for scoring, some things like not accepting donations and not donating to privacy causes are penalized and so is not having an ethical copy policy for both the VPN provider and their affiliates.
The data might be useful but some of the scoring is nonsensical.