i5-6600k vs i7-4790k Which one is better if the cost the same?

I can have them for the same price since with i7 i will reuse my current ram, my main use is gaming(~80%) and occasionally some ps/ai/cinema 4d/sony vegas work.
Which one of these two setups will perform better and last longer?

Skylake rig:
i5-6600K
HyperX FURY 2x4GB 2133MHz CL14
Asus H170-PRO

Haswell rig:
i7-4790K
HyperX Fury 2x8GB 1866MHz CL10
MSI Z97S SLI KRAIT EDITION

My current PC specs:
Windows 7 64bit
Corsair 230t
Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0
Corsair CX500M
Phenom II x6 1055t @ stock
CoolerMaster 212 evo
GTX 970 G1 Gaming
HyperX Fury 2x8GB 1866
Samsung 840 evo 120gb
Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200RPM

I would say either go X99 or stay with what you have,

If you "must" upgrade then save some $$ and go with an i5 4690 (k) or a Xeon 1231 v3.......

Just my $0.02 from my own research and the feedback I have gotten from those who I have spoken to regarding my current build.

http://anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation

The haswell i7 is going to be better than the new i5 for sony vegas work and gameing isent much difference between i5's and i7's.
(video work) http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/core_i5_6600k_processor_review_desktop_skylake,11.html
(gameing) http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/core_i5_6600k_processor_review_desktop_skylake,15.html

well with the skylake i5 you probably need new ram.
Unless you could find a board that supports DDR3 on skylake, but till now i havent seen any as of yet.

if you can upgrade to the 4790K for the same price, then you can re-use your ddr3 ram on the haswell platform.
I would then go with the 4790K, simply because it saves money.

also as @cooperman says, the i7 will be better anyways.

DDR3L not DDR3, no?

Correct @Commodore_64

Is your CPU really holding you back? Because you might as well wait for next year when zen/skylake 2.0 drop

In my country (Mexico) the 5820K its cheaper than the 6700k, and the 4790K has droped its price to a sexy $352 usd. Believe me, $352 its super cheap compared to months ago, its actually the cheapest price for that processor I have ever seen in my country. The 6700k costs $428 for comparison.

In Australia the 6700k is $530 and the 5820k $560, in comparison the 3770 (non-k) cost me $300 in 2012. There is no way I would buy the Skylake i7 or i5 at that price. I would either go x99, z97 or AM3+.

I feel the bottleneck screaming in my system, gpu usage never goes beyond 70%.
X99 is way too expensive, I live in Poland, 2011-3 mobos here cost 300-550usd.

That's exactly the situation i tried to explain, skylake + mobo + ddr4 is the same price as haswell + mobo. And with Haswell i7 i get twice as much of ok ram(HyperX Fury 2x8GB 1866MHz CL10) and quite good mobo(MSI Z97S SLI KRAIT EDITION) , with Skylake i will have half the capacity of fairly slow ram(HyperX FURY 2x4GB 2133MHz CL14) and shit tier mobo(Asus H170-PRO).

I don't really get what you are trying to say, i can't get ddr3 mobo for skylake.

Here, in Poland, it's similar, chips on their own are basically the same price but z97 mobos are way cheaper and i don't have to get ram.

Basically what I'm asking is which of those processors will perform better, last longer and will the ddr3 hold back Haswell down the line?

The 4790k vs 6600k is very little in performance difference. Just better igpu and some programs run faster.(due to new instruction sets)

For gaming their wont be a difference but video their might be.(don't video edit so go with others on that)

I always get an i7 series I don't mess around with the i5 line, i mean even an old i7 870 is still more than strong enough to game on, which was being used as my "server" till i just recently got an HP G5.

You dont have to get a z97 but maybe an h97? Might be cheaper. but to know that the h97 is not really an overclocking board it can do it but not recommend. An expensive board is not worth it in my opinion. I usually go for boards less than $100.

You can't really say if DDR3 will hold something back, I'd like to say not for some time, but who knows. a haswell build will probably be sufficient for 5 years possibly even longer..

I also suggest just using the single fastest gpu you can afford. instead of going sli/xfire.

When i built my 4790k system i built in with the plan i would only ever need to upgrade the gpu and add storage space.

while this is true pci-e 16x v4 is not going to run in a v3 spot so unless they make both versions of cards you will have to upgrade at some point.

Well even the new z170 boards don't have v4 and i doubt that gpu vendors would cut off v3 and all the potential sales. For a good while we will see pcie3 support.

Plus my plan was for the system to last 5-6 years so i think i'm ok. I generally see motherboard and processor upgrades as pointless given 5% a release we get in speed and most games being gpu bound.

When i build i make sure I have a solid processor, MB, and psu. Everything else can be upgraded around the core.

1 Like

DDR3 holds nothing back realy.
Also ram speeds basicly dont matter that much.
There wont be any significant diffrence between 1600mhz and 2133mhz for that matter.
Also in video rendering, it isnt a significant diffrence.

Highspeed memory only realy makes sense, if you build a system based on an apu or igpu.

My point was skylake is DDR3L compatible not DDR3 so you would need new DDR3L to use a variant of DDR3 with it so no point just get DDR4.
DDR3L is kept for mobile compatibility or something?

RAM speed hasn't mattered for gaming since at least DDR2, if you upgrade now at best you'll get a 30% performance increase going to haswell/broadwell/skylake.

Your CPU appears to be running stock, so overclock it. if it's still bottlenecking, then just try to find some cheap ivy bridge parts, otherwise just save your money for next year and get a major performance boost when new stuff drops.

Your CPU should still be able to get well over 40fps in most games.Even more so with an OC