Hi i have bought a HP LTO -5 ultrium 3000 tape drive and i am wondering if this Mini-SAS-SFF-8643 to 4 29pin SFF-8482 connectors will work with my motherboard. So i just want to hear if other guys have tried something like this. And if no other people have tried this. Then i will report what the outcome is so other people can learn from me.
I have checked the HP LTO -5 ultrium 3000 manual and it seems that the SAS SFF-8643 connector is what i need.
But what i am going to try is connecting the Mini SAD SFF 8643 also know as the new U2 connector to my motherbard but the big questions will it work but i am right now waiting for the cable.
But i am curious if some guys have experience connecting a LTO tape drive or other hardware to the U2 (Mini SAD SFF 8643) on motherboards.
Here is a list of hardware i am using for this prosject.
I can’t comment on that setup - but watching with interest as I do have a Quantum LTO2 tape drive working in Linux (but it’s LVD SCSI) and I’m looking to upgrade it at some point.
I am gonna use a linux distro for the os so in my case either fedora or ubuntu. The software I am gonna use is either bacula but I read one can also use the mt tape drive utility and use tar to compress the files.
I have the hp tape drive and LTO 5 cartridges they were shipped faster so now I am only waiting for the SAS cable
The LTO 5 tapes seems good they where cheap in Norway only 32 dollar for one and they where brand-new ones . But thing is that the tape drives are expensive but i where lucky i got mine for 233 dollar on the used market and it was lightly used.
I’m not too confident it’ll work but I don’t really know for sure. In theory, it shouldn’t; because the U.2 connector on the motherboard is really just a PCIE connection, and according to the B&H spec sheet for the LTO-7:
the tape drive connection is a SAS 6Gbps connection, which would imply you’d need an expansion card with a sas controller to address the tape drive.
I’ve never played with anything like that tape drive reader so I’m not 100%, but I wouldn’t assume it would work. If I had to guess, I’d think you’d need something like a Lsi 9211-8i to make it work. But who knows, that’s just my guess.
You maybe right i bought the cables because it was cheaper than a raid card so if it do not work i will buy a raid card. And TheCaveman thank you for the link.
I also read that U2 connector is the SAS SFF-8643 connector and in HP LTO -5 ultrium 3000 manual it said that you either need a raid controller or a connector on the motherboard but time will show.
I use a mixture of dump, tar and mt (mt-st NOT mt-GNU) for backups, archives and controlling the tape drive respectively.
Note that dump should only be used to backup filesystem snaphots, as it’s not wise to backup a live mounted filesystem.
You don’t want a RAID card, you need a SAS HBA (Host Bus Adapter). For example here’s a link to a list of qualified HBAs for all Tandberg SAS tape drives. The likelihood is these would work with your drive (but see if you can find an equivalent list for HP):
Hi all, first post so apologies for the necropost but it looks like the right people were here albeit a while back
I hoped that now you’ve all had a few years of experience with this I might benefit from your knowledge here
Requirement:
I’ve similar hardware to the OP above (modern CPU/MB , external LTO-5 tape drive, cartridges, SAS HBA) and I’d like to to use LTFS on a Linux daily driver workstation (not a dedicated server) used to edit and save/backup large video and digital camera RAW files.
Questions:
what software on Linux with GUI access can you recommend?
what Linux distro flavors have better support for LTO, LTFS and backup software; Debian, RedHat, OpenSUSE, other?
Does anything on Linux compare to the Windows Explorer folder drag-and-drop GUI-based LTFS support that you get on Windows 7/8/10 etc?
This is closed as it is outside the revived thread guidelines. Feel free to create a fresh topic, or PM one of the Leaders if you think this was incorrectly closed. See here for more info.
@CyberSocialist the thread is over 2 years old already so it might be better to just create fresh one.