I have not seen an honest benchmark comparing the Kevari A10 4+8 to the FX 8350.
Wouldn't running the benchmarks with the same memory and add-in graphics card be best? Why do they always compare a baseline Kevari chip to an overclocked FX 8350 with a 290x and then call the Kevari "casual"?
Can Tek Syndicate do a fair comparison? Give us a benchmark worth reading for a change? (Not saying that Tek Syndicate does bad benchmarks, just stating that the viable information on this particular piece of hardware is extremely limited).
Thanks!