HDD reccomendations after Caviar Black?

Bad news; I ran the Data Lifeguard Diagnostic utility from WD. Halfway I stopped the check because I had to finish off some work; I can't work while it's running and I thought this is going to take a hell lot of time. Even though the scanning wasn't complete it spotted a bad sector. I was going to repair it but I was like, "fuck this I'm not ready to get my data at risk of loss. Mirror on the 1st queue".


So I did not mend the bad sector but if I tried to next time and if it gets more critical and unrepairable; keep in mind I still have store warrenty on this drive [b]AND[/b] this is the 2nd Caviar Black I had after the 1st one crashed, what other drives do you guys reckon that I should go for?


Thoughts, thoughts...

Mmmm never had any bad experience with BLACK's. Keep gettin' em

seagate barracudas seem to be the shit with being cheap, Sata III and single platter, haven't heard anything bad myself, I think the terabyte ones have two 500GB platters

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148701

hrm they are apparently having some firm ware issues with a certain model, other than that they seem pretty legit, over all high rating

uh I'm not very familiar with any non-US/Canadian based stores sorry

I always get Caviar Blacks just because they perform well. You could always check out the Western Digital RE4's or Velociraptors for more speed, but a Seagate barracuda would probably be a pretty safe bet to get something similar to the Caviar Black.

I'm running two Samsung Spinpoint 1TB's, they kick ass :D

Yeah, I've heard the samsung spinpoints are pretty nice too.

Vortex said:

Yeah, I've heard the samsung spinpoints are pretty nice too.

Yeah I think I remember that there were a couple of members here that said they peform well also.

Whatever you do, don't get a Hitachi.

WD-CB are the best high-capacity enthusiast HDDs. Sure, Samsung and Seagate are good too, but WD stands untouchable in the high-performance and eco-friendly market. Ofc, like any other top-quality brand, you gotta pay for it.

I'm running the blue caviar right now Running really good!

Boov said:

Whatever you do, don't get a Hitachi.

Yeah that's important to other "new" members too. We discussed about their drives in the past I believe (around 3 years back?) and there were high reports of drive failure. I have no idea about Seagate's drives; although there was one member (our good ol Prawn, remember him all of our old members? :D) ranting about these drives failing on him numerous times for each one another. Got any more suggestions about Seagate?

I actually have a Seagate Barracuda AND a caviar black, and I get better performance from the caviar black, I've had a couple of caviar blues but they tend to die on me....I guess you have just had some really bad luck with your Caviar blacks cuz I think mine is the best drive I've ever owned and I hear only good things about them

wooly4 said:

I actually have a Seagate Barracuda AND a caviar black, and I get better performance from the caviar black, I've had a couple of caviar blues but they tend to die on me....I guess you have just had some really bad luck with your Caviar blacks cuz I think mine is the best drive I've ever owned and I hear only good things about them

is it a newer one, becuase they just started putting them on the Sata III interface recently although its not going to saturate that but I imagine it would still pretty fast in Sata II mode, not knocking the WD caviar blacks though, the comparable seagate drives are cheaper, at least on newegg, I found a 32MB 6Gb/s terabyte seagate drive $10-20 cheaper than a 32MB multiplatter 500GB 3GB/s caviar black

Destroyed007 said:

Yeah that's important to other "new" members too. We discussed about their drives in the past I believe (around 3 years back?) and there were high reports of drive failure. I have no idea about Seagate's drives; although there was one member (our good ol Prawn, remember him all of our old members? :D) ranting about these drives failing on him numerous times for each one another. Got any more suggestions about Seagate?

Seagates are good reliable drives, I had one for about 10 years I think, it never broke.

WD makes HDDs with 64MB cache. Yes please.

GigaBuster.exe said:

is it a newer one, becuase they just started putting them on the Sata III interface recently although its not going to saturate that but I imagine it would still pretty fast in Sata II mode, not knocking the WD caviar blacks though, the comparable seagate drives are cheaper, at least on newegg, I found a 32MB 6Gb/s terabyte seagate drive $10-20 cheaper than a 32MB multiplatter 500GB 3GB/s caviar black

Older seagate Barracuda, newer Caviar Black, in the baracudas defense its using a shitty marvell Sata controller