Hawaii missile false alarm due to badly designed user interface, reports say


Kept the Uranium One indictments out of the news
Mission accomplished.

Uranium one indictment is also bogus though. Double bogus. :smile: I love it.

Plenty of other sources searcheable.

1 Like

Completely agree

Nah nah windows me is fiiiiiine

So if I as an attacker, want to inflict more casualties, I should lure people out of their bunkers with Twitter, because the people are being told to trust a different webapp over official channels? Yeah, that sounds great.

Last time I visited Pearl (the 80’s) I remember seeing a fleet or Aegis missle cruisers there


Plus they have gas turbines, cold iron to flank in 12 minutes flat.
The employee has been reassigned, no media seems to want an interview. I do not buy the interface explanation. This was a strait up stunt

1 Like

Security! Do you speak it?

lol and I imagine this is a password that is typed in regularly, perhaps daily.

seems very secure. Unbreakable.

Below are a sequence of images explaining the true sequence of events.

image

image

image
“may already exist”

image

image
simply put, the automated system was triggered by an object visible to the system - but visibly indescernable to the eye and imperceivable on radar.
Let us raise our tin foil hats to Grumman for being either first or second, whichever one no one knows.

Finally I conclued this pictorial investigation of the “science” with the quality “meme”
image

1 Like

That UI was actually bogus. See @torpcoms demo above somewhere.

1 Like

This is starting to get intersting :slight_smile:


http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/01/24/breaking-news/schatz-to-lead-hearing-on-alert-systems-in-wake-of-hawaii-blunder/

1 Like