So right now I have the Haswell 4670k and unfortunately, it's not the best chip and I only got it to like 4.2 ghz stable. Is it worth switching to the 4690k (Devil's Canyon), or is there not much of a difference when it comes to overclocking because I heard the thermals are better.
if you have the cash in your pocket, doesn't sound bad. My 4670K is completely stable at 4.5 Ghz so I don't have a problem with it. the 4690K is suppose to overclock much better (better thermal paste and power delivery, plus more power efficient)
It really comes down to you. Is your 4670K bottlenecking your system? or is it functioning fine at 4.2 Ghz? if your current chip is powerful enough, then there is no reason to upgrade.
its worth it if you are still Running a ivy bridge or sandy bridge Processor. but if you are running haswell which you just stated you are. than its just a waste because you aren't going to see a noticeable improvement. also do you think its worth spending a couple hundred dollars for extra megahertz on your CPU?
if you are running z87 than don't do it. save your money and wait for broadwell.
Performance is obviously not that noticable but if he already invested in an OC board and had bad luck with his 4670k then devil's canyon would be a considerable upgrade, potentially a ghz faster.
So for an OCer selling with a good price to buy this isn't a very bad idea
I agree, I am highly looking forward to Skylake based on some of the stuff that Intel have hinted at about it we might finally get out of the Sandy Bridge based saga we've been sitting in for the past 3, coming up on 4, generations.
Wikipedia has a little list of the nice rumors surrounding Skylake (several even have sources attached)
well im still very happy with my FX8350, and if amd does not come with anything new for AMD FX in 2016, i may concider to switch to skylake, or the skylake succesor. depending on how far the gaming market is optimized then.