At the end of the day a 1080/1080ti is an enthusiast GPU or at very least a very very high end GPU, and you NEVER get price to performance at that level, do you really think if AMD had the userbase or the performance to match they wouldn't price their stuff similarly?? Their stuff isn't cheap because they want to be nice, its because, AMD have a bad reputation/popularity and wouldn't sell without cheap prices
look at hexus review, seems biased towards nv, i'm not sure how they got their review since no1 else has those temps. (always showing fury x on 4th place, and loosing even in battlefront)
I pinned this topic for a week, so that people could ask questions, or post all information about the GTX1080 reviews and benchmarks. To keep everything nice and centralized.
Seems like its around 30% faster than 980ti witch is still a nice upgrade, but the price is way off, 620 gbp or 6100 dkk. they make it sounds like its a new architecture, but its still just Maxwell in steroids. looking forward to Polaris, i just want 390x/Fury performance for a lower power and price, and im all happy :)