It is and it isn’t. Actually getting to know whether or not someone is inflammatory is a potentially good idea before allowing pol amongst those users… TL3 users here are typically docile… The TL2s are reasonable… Most recent basics ehhh mehh. Not so much haha
banned users using alts tend to do whatever nonsense that got them banned when they come back and all it takes is one leader to get suspicious and ask in the LL for a mod to look for accounts with matching IPs
I’ve done this several times
Okay, so let’s assume it’s happening, this is what I see the three options being:
- Public category, opt-out after TL1
- Private category, opt-in after TL1
- Private category, opt-in at TL0
public category opt out after TL1 exactly how off topic is
Do we have TL0?
TL0 is new. TL1 is basic. TL2 is member. TL3 is regular. TL4 is leader.
Yes I’m aware of that I just wondered what makes a TL0 get to TL1
Edited the poll, vote again yall.
That was pretty unanimous early on haha
I would prefer TL2, since TL1 is too easy.
No, thats too restrictive and would do little to prevent blow ups as I find more dedicated users in higher trust levels to have stronger opinions and consequentially cause more arguments.
The lounge has the most arguments and its all TL2 and higher users
Wenn it happens then it should be for everyone.
That is my opinion on the matter.
We cannot ban TL 0 or 1 users for creating political related topics.
And allow TL2 user to do so.
That would be totally bullshit.
I’m not quite sure that is exactly what’s occurring… Also TL2 is stupid easy to achieve? Its simply a commit to the forum be good. get pol as reward?
That’s not the argument. This is why I’m arguing to let them in at TL1. If you come on and make a political thread before you hit TL1, that’ll be impressive.
It’s not TL2, I should have been more clear. It becomes visible at TL1.
Hold up, political discussion in the leader lounge but not regular lounge?
I thought this was common knowledge.
Damn you had me going for a sec on the TL2 bus okay correction TL1