Benchmarking by AdoredTV.
Post any more of you find around....
NVidia was pounding their chest over Vulkan, and the GTX 1080 had an ounce of difficulty against a puny RX 480? They sure know how to convince people.
2 Likes
Doesn't the weaker cards see the greatest improvement from API's like dx12/vulkan than the powerful cards?
no, AMD cards see greatest improvement from those API's, and lower end cpu's (work feeding issues).
2 Likes
Sounds cool, until I realized that my CPU is a lot stronger than my GPU on both of my current computers.
i5 4300U/Intel HD 4400
i7 5820K/R9 390
debatable.
Gonna go check if Unity or Unreal Engine supports Vulkan.
not yet, unreal engine kinda supports dx12 - its getting more mature (but still in infant stage)
Aww man. Maybe some day.
well its going to be hard - as there needs to be a lot of tools created for editing settings for async etc - there's a lot of customization is required to get advantages over dx11.
Apparently there is Vulkan in UE4 actually, but Vulkan itself is at it's infancy.
https://wiki.unrealengine.com/Vulkan
This gives me so much hope for my R9 Fury to get me to 2018!
I really like how that 260€ card gives the 800€ card a run for its money. I am impressed!
Any one have a results screen shot or spread sheet at work and can't watch the video.
for furyx?
https://www.computerbase.de/2016-07/doom-vulkan-benchmarks-amd-nvidia/
FuryX got 66% uplift in performance in 1080p
This one from pcper:
Another that seems to include similar results...Although not as detailed as AdoredTV.
Give it a few more weeks nvidia will find someone to pay off to gimp vulkan and make it look like nvidia's better.
1 Like
I do not think that the companys involved would accept that.
1 Like
Nvidia does not support asynchronous compute at the hardware level. Just wait, in a few weeks maybe at 1060 launch. they will patch something that will bypass this feature. Do their Voodoo and somehow end up on top again.