So my processor so far has been amazing me. It's been able to overclock to 4.8ghz on just 1.296v.
Today, I decided that 1.18v at stock just wasn't low enough, and I wanted to go even lower. I so far have managed, stock 4.4ghz @1.136v, and I'm definitely gonna try to go lower.
**** Edit. Final number is: 4.4ghz @ 1.088v ****
Is this normal for a haswell refresh?? I'm just so surprised because my previous CPU --i5 2500k-- needed so much more voltage just to hit the same clocks.
At those speeds I'm in the top 50 results for the XTU benchmark on HWBot. Cool to see Intel parts that aren't limited to 4.4Ghz as a lot of modern K series parts have been.
Tagged with my friend's name since I sold the chip to him along with the board about a day later, and he wanted something to show to his friends. Was a blast to OC!
Late edit: Didn't want to make this about me, just showing that YES Devil's Canyon chips seem to be extremely well binned or have really high yields over Haswell, because a number of them just OC like crazy. Enjoy yours! If you're feeling brave you can even shoot for that 5.0GHz for the bragging rights!
possible if you disable your igpu. While I don't own haswell, i can speak about i5 2500k and i7 3770k; on stock voltage my sandy bridge i5 could go up to 4.9GHz... ~ 5GHz but it was getting fairly hot at this point. on i7 i can easily push with stock volt to 3.6GHz but heat generated is too much... as there's power leak in ivy bridge arch.
From what I'm understanding SiSoftware Sandra CPU benchmarks use AVX. That's what I used to test it.
Edit: I ran the SiSoftware Sandra CPU benchmark titled "Cryptography" with HWmonitor open.
CPU temp got up to 62c at 100% load. Package wattage was 76.51 watts. Not sure if that's the power being drawn by my CPU or the measured TDP? (which should be 88?) I don't really understand HWmonitor all that much...