Ima thinking of building a new PC. I'm stuck in getting the CPU/GPU pairing right. I have 2 options: i5 3350P/nVidia 660 (MSI Twin Frozr) or i3 3220/AMD 7870 Tahiti LE (Powercolour).
I suppose I could... But I'm not sure if the 6300 is THAT much better than the i3 to go up to it. I would have about £40 change from £600 if I went with the i3 setup whereas the i5 setup would cost the full £600
No, he meant switch the i3 to the FX 6300. They are probably about the same price, and AMD does tend to work somewhat better with itself. I would like to have a FX 6300 with a Powercolor PCS+ Radeon HD 7870 (Tahiti) as that setup is considerably more powerful in gaming tests than an i3 with the same setup, or the i3 with the 660Ti
Going with the 6300 and an overclockable board (Gigabyte 970A UD3) I come to a figure of £588. I would need to buy a cooler as well but i suppose I could leave off overclocking until a later date...
I'm still not 100%. Another factor to figure in is that when I have a few more pounds lying around I might want to step up to one of Intel's more prestigous stock... If I go with AMD then I'll be locked into stepping up to something on par with a 3570K (which I suppose isn't such a bad thing). Unless AMD make some serious headway in the future...
Anyway. I feel we are starting to get away from the point at hand here. NOt only are we comparing CPUs but also the GPUs too. How does the 7870 Tahiti LE compare with the 660? Obviously it is the better card but by how much?
PS sorry for clogging up the post... I am quite a 'type on the fly' kinda guy. Whatever pops into my head finds its way onto the screen.
i3 is out of the picture, its cool for surfing websites, but was it~!
the FX6300 is much better and faster then the i3, and it also better and faster then the i5-3570.
so ofcourse the amd is the best way to go here.
the FX-6300 is competentive with the i5-3570K and it get the same fps in the game battlefield 3 on ultra, as the i7 3770K i posted a movie about somewhere before.
so yes for gaming you deffantely better with the FX6300 the i3 is useless, and the i5-3570 also not the best choice.
about gpu, i dont know much about about nvidia cards, but i readed somewhere the a 7870 is better then a GTX660
thats also a good option, but the i5 3570k is more expensive then the FX6300, and for gaming, i dont think it wil perform much slower then the i5,
maybe something for Logan wenn he reads this, im a bit currios, for a gaming benchmark battle between a 3570k and a FX6300 with diffrent games! i saw Battlefield 3 on ultra, on a FX6100 getting exact the same scores at the same spots in a game, as the i7-3770k