I am very interest in both cases as I am doing a mini itx build. I have all my components picked but I really can't figure out which one I want. I have seen the positives and negatives of both. They have completely opposite positive and negatives which is making it really hard. In the n200 you can do some *decent* cable management and in the hadron you can't really do any thing about it and then you will be forced to look at it through the side window. In the n200 the quality of the case is not as good as the hadron and it is flimsy but you pay a premium for that by getting the hadron. I really can not make my mind up so please tell me which one you think would be best!
Corsair 250D in my opinion, but that's just me.
But between the two you posted, I think the Cooler Master might be a better bet simply because if the PSU unit breaks in the Hadron you are out of luck because it appears to be part of the case, meaning you wouldn't be able to replace it with a different one if it dies.
Yeah, I understand where you are coming from but if the power supply broke I am sure Evga would jump on that and send out a replacement rather quickly as their customer support is just pure awsome. The corsair 250D does look like a decent case but I have been avoiding corsair cases for the last year or so because their case/chassis build quality has just gone down the tubes and even in some of Logan's unboxing videos you can tell the case quality has just not been up to par.
What if it breaks after the warranty expires?
Anyway, their looks are very different. Choose whatever you like best, I think you should be able to make a good decision which you won't regret afterwards based on looks alone.