Not far behind my 5820K at stock, nice.
their new dual rendering is gpu bound
1 Like
I5-5200u time, full benchmark: 6:11:30.68.
This was in my XPS 13 9343, plugged in and laying on its side.
2 Likes
I completely forgot about this. Downloading the benchmark now.
1 Like
Ryzen 1700X at stock with 32GBx3000MHz.
Ugh, I need an account to submit my results? Thereās a fail, I donāt want an account 
Will edit with GPU results shortly.
1 Like
this benchmark does not seem accurate. Are you guys running the full or the quick version?
1 Like
Yeah something is a bit funny. It wonāt run on my GPU, just sits there saying itās starting and the GPU tach spikes and then goes back to nothing.
1 Like
thatās par for the course on AMD cards, if youāre running one.
The reason I ask is that my actual, real installation of blender renders the the same bmw .blend much faster, and Iām sure thatād be the case if I loaded up the other source .blends as well.
the data may be taking into account GPU renders in that data
a core i3 with a 1070 will render something much faster on the cuda backend than just a cpu render on a ryzen system will.
I ran Blender workloads on Vega just fine before.
1 Like
last i checked AMD support is in the experimental feature set.
that doesnāt matter. If this is based on the stable branch of 2.79, and theyāve disabled experimental features to make sure it works, there may be AMD compute conflicts.
try running it from the cli after passing the CYCLES_OPENCL_TEST-ALL env variable
Are you talking in Blender? Because I donāt have it installed anymore.
no with the benchmark
open up cmd, navigate to the benchmark folder with cd, type set CYCLES_OPENCL_TEST=all then execute blender-benchmark.exe from the same command prompt
if that doesnāt work try set CYCLES_OPENCL_TEST=true
crap that was supposed to be an = not a -
my bad
so CYCLES_OPENCL_TEST=all
