Irrelevant of accuracy or merit my post hilights an issue with the user’s presence.
The supplied information does not directly deal with this issue.
Yeah, it’s a good point, but it appears to have been peer-reviewed by him. The clarity is a major problem with this whole situation.
Hey… i got some text typed on a white paper, could y’all review it for me?
Yep, those are words.
They’re even in English!
Sweet! I’ll now announce that my fly by night company with brand new comment disabled YouTube channel and recently secured domain demands you fix your vulnerabilities by tomorrow!!!111 And its peer reviewed!
I’m not a peer. I don’t even like boats.
At least its not pear reviewed.
That would be rotten.
Its really bad when it goes pear shaped… like this attempt at smearing AMD to drop the stock price.
Ah, this thread is worth a good chuckle after a long day at work.
Glad all this blew over with little to no repercussions for AMD. I need competition in the CPU market like I need GPU prices to go down.
So are you peer reviewing the thread?
Peer reviewed by…
This is the definition of fake news.
We’ll welcome you with open source arms.
I think we need to list and ‘review’ all the news sources that published this clickbait crap and depending upon how they handled it treat them accordingly.
Toms handled it in the predicted manner :)~
So apparently the only person to see the actual exploits is in fact, being paid by CTS:
Gamers Nexus has weighed in… hint… they think its bullshit too: