They tend to order first and the most. So intel charging them $10000 for a cpu and turning around and selling it to the consumers for $5000. It looks bad and is a quick way to make enemies
Not only that, but DELL, Cisco, etc. have already bought X number of CPUs at Y price and havenât sold them yet.
if intel was to drop their pants by say 50-80 percent, a competitor would snap them up perhaps.
Intel has set the barâŚPromises were made. Outhâs in the ancient language.
To come out and say well $10k 28 core CPUs were stupidâŚAMD does 32 cores ones at $6666k.
Consumer market AMD does 32 core CPUâs for $3666. Is kind of embarrassing.
How about we do a consumer 22 core at 5GHz no LOLz âŚ4Ghz and the 22 core chips you pay x3 for âŚwELL fuck AMDâŚwE HAVE 10nm to bitch slap your 7nm and planned 7nm+.
Cry me a river. Intel has market share on servers and massive production to feed that server beast. AMD are better hardware and software exploit wise but cant do Intel Volumes. Because FABâs
Intel are fucked but in control because they can do the volume only. There tech is deadâŚDead in the water.
Companies will wait till next year for the intel 10nm Miracle.
It is not coming and AMD will continue to steam roll them without capacity to fulfil server demand.
AMD can only grow so fast fab wise. Every cloud idiot wants cloud servers and AMD is the only choice. Unless you want CPU flaws and 10nm issues.
2c
P.S Im drunk and promise not to edit this cause people whine.
2 Likes
Drunk marten âŚmice drop !.
More like you swallowed the mic.
I see people speak of this as it will have major implications for the Xeon market. It wonât.
Intel has omnipath, optane, ECC, 1,5TB RAM support.
Any discussion about this with the partners would be over before it began.
1 Like
I know know matter what AMD cant do intel production output.
Networking, AMD does no do that.
3D-Xpoint (optane) took a long path of failures and delays and to this day, their density sucks (compared to 3D-VNAND), or they overprovision to the moon because it is not reliable.
ECC and 1.5TB RAM are not new.
I think you misunderstood my point.
My argument is that the 28 core consumer part wonât make a big outcry from the datacenter market.
Even if it sells for $3000
You mentioned server features, so I assumed this is about server parts.
Intel is/was good at segmenting their markets. It will be fine in that regard.
The question at hand is if they win benchmarks for âperformance per dollarâ or âperformance kingâ.
They lost that the minute Ryzen was released.
So⌠what is even the problem then?
I did so too and I think I know why. You wrote
That leads into thinking âcompared to not Intel, so AMDâ.
Should have been more clear then. I meant Intel HEDT vs Xeon.
amd has 2tb ram support and ECC. in much cheaper platforms. optane is DOA.
AMD has massive pcie lane advantage (1900x is just made for storage box vendors). Cisco have already signed up for EPYC, as has Microsoft for Azure.
Read above, I wasnt comparing to AMD.
you really have a funny way of writing that.
Hasnât that already devolved into a 22 core part ? I am keen to see what actually ships this year.
The 22-core is going on X299 IIRC. But that might just be a rumor.
That would be an XCC die on LGA2066, probably doable but would surprise me.
Well Intel is getting kinda desperate from a PR perspective.
2 Likes