Title says it all. Is that kind of resolution going to be great for graphic design work? Thanks.
I would think so, but then again, I recommended it in the other thread. It really depends on if you need a pixel height greater than that for editing. Some people, especially those that do a lot of work with photography in things like Adobe Lightbox or that happen to do a lot of work in Adobe Aftereffects may find that a 2560x1600 monitor better suits their needs. I, however, prefer to have a standard sized 1080p window of something open and then have room off to the side to either drag my palettes off to the side to or to have other applications or a web browser open in. It's also very useful if you happen to record anything in a full cinematic 21x9 display proportions, since you can review it without black bars, although a 2560x1600 monitor could give you the same clarity with the black bars. It's really up to you.
Random topic, what motherboard would you recomend for this kind of build. You know my priorities. Haha! Getting a 3930K. I looked at a Sabertooth X79. Not too sure though.
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/asus-motherboard-rampageivformula
Gives you so damn much control over everything, plus it has an additional power source connection for your DIMM slots so that you can overclock them better when you have all the slots filled. And given that you seem to have an adequate amount of money, I would stuff them full of something fast and large. I'd say 8 gig sticks of 2133 MHz RAM a piece. Patriot makes some very attractive red ones, that are currently at a reasonable price. The black ones are even more attractive, but are also more expensive right now. Also, if you wanted to, you could try finding an Asus ROG compatible graphics card and do up the motherboard connectors for that and get in-bios voltage and overclocking control of the graphics card.